Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 List of the location and characteristics of QTLs found using the three methods in P. mariana

From: The genomic architecture and association genetics of adaptive characters using a candidate SNP approach in boreal black spruce

Linkage group a Trait Year Methodb Site c QTL LOD threshold
  Positiond LOD score or P-valuee PVE f At linkage group scale At genome-wide scale
1 growth 2007 IM site#1 60-73 3.25 6.5 3.4 (2.9) 4.3 (3.8)
1 growth 2006 nIM site#1 60-78 3.7 - 3.2 (2.8) 4.4 (3.9)
1 budset 2006 IM site#1 68-73 2.87 7.9 3.3 (2.8) 4.4 (3.7)
1 budset 2007 IM site#1 81-90 3.25 6.8 3.2 (2.6) 5.1 (3.9)
1 budset 2006 KW site#2 90.00 **** - - -
1 budset 2007 IM site#1 58-114 3.09 6.5 3.2 (2.8) 4.8 (3.5)
1 budset 2007 nIM site#1 108-108 3.1 - 3.2 (2.8) 4.4 (3.9)
1 budset 2007 K-W site#1 149.00 ****** - - -
3 budset 2007 K-W site#2 85.00 *** - - -
3 growth 2007 K-W site#2 85.00 *** - - -
4 budset 2007 K-W site#1 76.00 **** - - -
4 budset 2007 K-W site#1 87.00 *** - - -
4 budset 2007 nIM site#2 89-89 4.57 - 3.2 (2.8) 4.5 (4.2)
4 budset 2007 nIM site#1 75-118 4.1 - 3.6 (2.8) 4.4 (3.9)
4 budset 2006 nIM site#2 88-119 3.42 - 3.3 (2.7) 4.7 (4.1)
4 budset 2006 K-W site#2 156.00 **** - - -
4 budset 2006 K-W site#2 160.00 **** - - -
4 budset 2006 K-W site#2 162.00 **** - - -
5 budset 2006 K-W site#1 18.00 **** - - -
5 budset 2006 K-W site#1 19.00 **** - - -
5 budset 2006 K-W site#1 20.00 *** - - -
5 budset 2006 nIM site#1 17-22 4.2 - 3.1 (2.8) 4.5 (4.1)
5 budset 2006 nIM site #1 36-42 3.2 - 3.1 (2.8) 4.5 (4.1)
5 budset 2006 IM site #1 34-68 4.47 5.3 4.3 (4.0) 4.5 (3.4)
5 budset 2006 IM site #1 59-65 3.17 9.7 3.4 (2.9) 4.4 (3.7)
5 growth 2006 IM site #1 111-129 3.55 7.8 3.4 (2.9) 5.1 (4.0)
5 budset 2006 K-W site #2 131.00 *** - - -
5 budset 2006 K-W site #1 131.00 *** - - -
5 budset 2007 IM site #1 127-134 3.43 6.1 3.6 (3.0) 4.8 (3.5)
5 growth 2006 IM site #1 131-142 3.2 7.6 3.5 (3.0) 4.5 (3.8)
5 budset 2006 nIM site #2 142-142 2.7 - 3.0 (2.7) 4.7 (4.1)
5 growth 2007 IM site #1 140-147 3.43 6.6 3.3 (2.9) 4.3 (3.8)
6 budset 2006 IM site #2 0-15 2.99 11.3 3.0 (2.5) 4.2 (3.7)
6 budset 2006 IM site #2 5-30 2.99 11.3 3.2 (2.7) 4.3 (3.9)
6 budset 2006 nIM site #1 82-86 2.7 - 3.0 (2.5) 4.5 (4.1)
6 budset 2007 nIM site #2 137-147 3.7 - 2.9 (2.4) 4.5 (4.2)
6 budset 2007 K-W site #2 169.00 ***** - - -
6 budset 2007 K-W site #2 170.00 **** - - -
7 budset 2006 nIM site #2 11-16 2.8 - 3.0 (2.7) 4.7 (4.1)
7 growth 2006 IM site #1 82-95 2.89 7.5 3.2 (2.7) 5.1 (4.0)
7 growth 2006 nIM site #1 99-99 2.6 - 3.1 (2.6) 4.4 (3.9)
8 budset 2007 IM site #2 9-15 2.99 10.8 3.1 (2.6) 4.2 (3.8)
8 budset 2007 IM site #2 18-29 3.14 11.7 3.1 (2.8) 4.8 (4.1)
9 growth 2007 IM site #2 62-70 2.95 12.3 3.0 (2.7) 5.3 (4.0)
10 budset 2006 K-W site #1 9.00 *** - - -
10 budset 2006 K-W site #1 20.00 *** - - -
10 budset 2007 nIM site #1 99-104 3 - 3.3 (2.9) 4.4 (3.9)
11 budset 2007 IM site #2 0-5 2.94 9.9 2.0 (1.6) 4.2 (3.8)
11 budset 2007 nIM site #2 7-14 2.3 - 2.6 (2.1) 4.5 (4.2)
12 budset 2006 nIM site #1 11-11 2.7 - 3.1 (2.7) 4.5 (4.1)
12 growth 2007 nIM site #1 31-33 3.8 - 3.1 (2.8) 4.6 (3.9)
12 growth 2007 IM site #1 37-48 3.22 8.2 3.1 (2.7) 4.3 (4.0)
12 budset 2006 IM site #2 95-106 2.98 4 2.9 (2.5) 4.3 (3.9)
12 budset 2006 nIM site #2 98-100 2.9 - 3.2 (2.8) 4.7 (4.1)
12 budset 2006 K-W site #2 107.00 *** - - -
12 budset 2006 K-W site #2 109.00 **** - - -
  1. a Linkage group according to Pavy et al. 2008.
  2. b Methods of QTL detection: nIM, non-parametric interval mapping; IM, interval mapping; K-W, Kruskal-Wallis test (see material and methods).
  3. c According to Figure 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1.
  4. d Position in cM according to Kosambi function.
  5. e p-value for the Kruskal-Wallis tests: *** > 0.995; **** > 0.999; ***** > 0.9995; ****** > 0.9999.
  6. f PVE: proportion of variance explained.