Gene expression and genetic analysis reveal diverse causes of recessive self-compatibility in Brassica napus L.

BMC Genomics

Table 1 Plants SI phenotype of 30 F ₁ hybrids developed from S-1300 as the mother line

Male parent	Wuhan, 2010.5			Lanzhou, 2010.8			SI stability
	SI	PSI	SC	SI	PSI	SC
128-2	0	1	5	0	1	3
131-2	—	—	—	0	2	7
173-1	2	3	2	6	2	2
177-1	6	1	1	—	—	—
182-1	0	3	4	4	0	0
230-1	10	2	0	13	0	0	+
242-1	8	1	0	5	0	0	+
326-2	7	0	0	9	2	0	+
336-1	1	4	2	5	3	1
360-2	2	5	0	9	0	0
614-1	6	0	0	6	0	0	+
1100-1	0	1	6	5	0	0
1122-1	4	3	0	1	2	4
1241-1	13	1	0	7	0	0	+
1242-1	6	1	0	0	0	6
1621-1	0	4	3	1	0	1
1638-1	7	1	0	7	1	0	+
1728-1	7	0	0	8	1	0	+
1731-2	0	0	0	0	0	0
1745-1	7	2	0	7	0	0	+
1756-1	7	0	0	—	—	—
1760-2	7	1	0	2	4	2
1771-1	1	2	4	7	1	0
89008	8	1	0	10	0	0	+
68-1Chang	1	2	3	9	0	0
B409	11	2	0	7	2	0	+
C32	12	2	0	6	0	0	+
D29	0	0	6	0	0	1
ZY2045-2	4	0	0	—	—	—
Huashuang5	5	2	0	2	5	3

SI: self-incompatible, SCI <2; PSI (partially SI): 2 ≤ SCI <10; SC: self-compatible, SCI ≥10; +: stable recessive SC accessions. SCI was calculated as the number of seeds per flower.

ISSN: 1471-2164