Skip to main content

Table 1 Analysis of variance and mean values for physiological traits under glasshouse conditions

From: Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of a pale-green durum wheat mutant shows variations in photosystem components and metabolic deficiencies under drought stress

 

Booting

Anthesis

 

SWC

ΨW

gs

An

SWC

ΨW

gs

An

(%)

(Mpa)

(mol m-2s-1)

(μmol m-2s-1)

(%)

(Mpa)

(mol m-2s-1)

(μmol m-2s-1)

A) ANOVA F-values

Effect

        

Water treatment

0.36 n.s.

0.33 n.s.

0.040 n.s.

1.28 n.s.

405 ***

218.5 ***

90.1 ***

23.5 ***

Genotype

0.02 n.s.

0.33 n.s.

0.001 n.s.

1.07 n.s.

1.96 n.s.

3.56 n.s.

0.080 n.s.

0.83 n.s.

Water treatment x genotype

0.05 n.s.

8.22 n.s.

0.100 n.s.

0.97 n.s.

0.52 n.s.

0.61 n.s.

0.001 n.s.

2.00 n.s.

B) Mean values

Water treatment

Control

47.1

-0.500

0.255

10.03

47.2 a

-0.555 a

0.368 a

15.94 a

Water stress

48.9

-0.525

0.255

10.49

13.5 b

-1.205 b

0.135 b

10.85 b

Control

Wild-type

46.5

-0.550

0.254

10.32

45.4

-0.580

0.365

14.72

Mutant

47.6

-0.450

0.257

9.73

48.9

-0.530

0.371

17.16

Water stress

Wild-type

49.0

-0.450

0.259

10.50

12.9

-1.250

0.131

11.11

Mutant

48.7

-0.600

0.251

10.49

14.0

-1.160

0.139

10.58

  1. A) F-values of the analysis of variance and, B) means of soil water content (SWC), flag leaf water potential (ΨW), stomatal conductance (gs) and net photosynthetic rate (An) for each water treatment and for the wild-type and the mutant plants under control and water stress conditions. Water stress started at booting. ***P < 0.001, n.s. P > 0.05. For each variable, water treatment means with different letters are significantly different for a Tukey test.
Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us