Table 4 Repulsion analysis between LGs within HGs
HG | Number of LGs in repulsion | Number of LGs with no repulsion detected | Percentage of LGs with repulsion | LGs in repulsion | LOD score of linkage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 14 | 18% | HG1LG8-HG1LG25 | 7 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG1LG8-HG1LG6 | 7 |
2 | 5 | 18 | 22% | HG2LG1a-HG2LG27 | 7 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG2LG1b-HG2LG1c | 8 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG2LG1a-HG2LG35 | 7 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG2LG1c-HG2LG35 | 8 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG2LG72a-HG2LG72 | 5 |
3 | 0 | 20 | 0 | Â | Â |
4 | 2 | 16 | 11% | HG4LG1c-HG4LG1a | 6 |
5 | 5 | 8 | 38% | HG5LG47-HG5LG46 | 12 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG5LG52-HG5LG46 | 7 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG5LG48-HG5LG48a | 10 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG5LG52-HG5LG47 | 7 |
6 | 7 | 11 | 33% | HG6LG20-HG6LG58 | 5 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG6LG20-HG6LG1 | 5 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG6LG20-HG6LG17 | 5 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG6LG20-HG6LG59 | 5 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG6LG58-HG6LG59 | 7 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG6LG17-HG6LG59 | 7 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG6LG16-HG6LG1b | 6 |
7 | 4 | 12 | 25% | HG7LG42-HG7LG36 | 6 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG7LG36-HG7LG36a | 8 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG7LG36-HG7LG38 | 8 |
8 | 4 | 18 | 18% | HG8LG41-HG8LG23 | 5 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | HG8LG92-HG8LG93 | 5 |