| FUBARa | MEMEb | PAMLc |
---|
 | M8 | M2a |
---|
ω | ω >1d: 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
toxins | ω <1e: 5 | 0 | 0 |
0.69 | 0.73 |
κ | ω >1a: 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
toxins | ω <1b: 0 | 0 | 0 |
1.06NS | 1.06NS |
ALL | ω >1a: 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
toxins | ω <1b: 7 | (0 + 1) | 0 |
0.78 | 0.83 |
- aFast, Unconstrained BayesianApproximation (FUBAR).
- bSites detected as experiencing episodic diversifying selection (0.05 significance) by mixed effects model evolution (MEME).
- cPositively selected sites detected using the Bayes empirical approach implemented in the site models M8 and M2a. Number of positively selected sites detected at the posterior probability ≥0.99 and 0.95 are indicated in parenthesis. ω computed using M8 and M2a are also presented.
- dNumber of sites evolving under the influence of pervasive diversifying selection, detected by FUBAR at 0.9 posterior probability.
- e Number of sites evolving under the influence of pervasive purifying selection, detected by FUBAR at 0.9 posterior probability.
- ω = mean dN/dS.
- NS = not significant at 0.05 compared to the null model (M7: beta).