Skip to main content

Table 3 Simulated datasets used in this study

From: Comparison of mapping algorithms used in high-throughput sequencing: application to Ion Torrent data

Simulated data

Insertion rate

Deletion rate

Substitution rate

Total error rate

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.5

0.5

0

0

1

1

0.5

1

0

1.5

0.5

1

0.5

2

0.5

1

1

2.5

1

2

0

3

1

2

0.5

3.5

1

2

1

4

  1. The datasets each contained 50,000 reads with varying indel, substitution and error rates. The indel rate varied from 0 to 3%, the substitution rate varied from 0 to 1%, and the total error rate varied from 0 to 4%.