Skip to main content

Table 3 Validation of assembled contigs by re-sequencing using Sanger technology

From: Transcriptomic changes during regeneration of the central nervous system in an echinoderm

ContigID

Best blastx

ORF complete?

Frameshifts

Contig length, bp

Checked by Sanger

Insertions

Deletions

Substitutions

% Discrepancy

 

match

 

in ORF

 

sequencing, bp

    

Contig3756

CENPS

yes

no

665

564

8

0

1

1.60%

Contig7869

Myc

yes

no

3,268

2,922

0

0

0

0.00%

Contig54848

HuD/Elav

yes

1

4,404

3,431

9

2

3

0.41%

Contig19303

Lgr5

both 5’ and 3’ ends are missing

no

1,510

1,510

0

0

0

0.00%

Contig40997

NeuroD

both 5’ and 3’ ends are missing

no

745

470

0

1

2

0.64%

Contig1064

NF1A

yes

no

5,279

3,825

3

9

1

0.34%

Contig32193

NvProtien1

5’ end is missing

no

2,411

1,986

0

1

0

0.05%

Contig51632

Oct

both 5’ and 3’ ends are missing

no

1,947

1947

0

0

0

0.00%

Contig46302

Piwi

yes

no

3,430

2,929

0

0

3

0.10%

Contig67140

Sox

yes

no

3,096

2,889

2

0

0

0.07%

Contig20197

unknown

NA

NA

1,339

1,252

2

0

0

0.16%

Contig68289

Wnt3

yes

no

2,561

990

2

0

2

0.40%

Contig50192

DCLK

yes

no

3,152

2,474

0

0

3

0.12%

Contig8186

Lhx

yes

no

5,430

3,041

0

0

5

0.16%

Contig3071

FoxJ1

yes

no

2,523

2,404

2

3

0

0.21%

Contig10179

Klf

yes

no

2,336

2,074

1

0

0

0.05%

   

TOTAL:

44,096

34,708

29

16

20

0.19%