Skip to main content

Table 5 Co-occurrence analysis of IMMAD heterologous pairs

From: The multiplicity of alternative splicing decisions in Caenorhabditis elegansis linked to specific intronic regulatory motifs and minisatellites

IMMAD pair

Odds ratio

Number of genes

p-value*

AGCAGAC-GGTCTGC

17.6

8

1.2E-04

AGCAGAC-GATGAC

5.1

15

5.2E-03

ACYCCA-CCATCGT

5.0

23

1.3E-04

AGCAGAC-AGGAG

4.9

20

3.5E-03

GAATGTT-CCATCGT

4.8

19

7.6E-04

GAATGTT-TCTCTCT

4.8

39

8.1E-08

ACYCCA-TCTCTCT

4.5

46

4.2E-08

GATGAC-TCTCTCT

4.3

39

8.2E-07

CCATCGT-TCTCTCT

4.2

17

6.6E-03

ACYCCA-GATGAC

4.0

49

1.3E-07

CCATCGT-GATGAC

3.9

18

9.3E-03

ACATTCG-TCTCTCT

3.9

18

8.9E-03

ACYCCA-GAATGTT

3.6

47

3.9E-06

GAATGTT-CCACA

3.6

67

6.7E-07

GAATGTT-GATGAC

3.0

35

9.4E-04

GTCGT-TCTCTCT

3.0

46

2.1E-04

CCAGC-TGGAC

3.0

65

7.0E-06

AGGAG-RAGAAG

2.8

74

8.9E-06

ACYCCA-CCACA

2.5

76

2.3E-04

AGGAG-TGGAC

2.4

65

8.0E-04

ACYCCA-GTCGT

2.4

55

3.6E-03

AGGAG-CCACA

2.3

98

3.3E-04

CCACA-GTCGT

2.2

89

1.0E-03

  1. 23 out of the 136 possible IMMAD heterologous pairs present a co-occurrence enrichment within the introns flanking alternate exons of MASS genes. The reported number of genes is the number of MASS genes where a given IMMAD pair occurs. *the co-occurrence enrichment p-values were calculated by Fisher’s exact tests with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.