Skip to main content
Figure 4 | BMC Genomics

Figure 4

From: The accuracy of prediction of genomic selection in elite hybrid rye populations surpasses the accuracy of marker-assisted selection and is equally augmented by multiple field evaluation locations and test years

Figure 4

Cross-validated accuracies of prediction for genomic selection with regard to location and year. Cross-validation was performed using RR-BLUP across genotype within location [CVG (L)] or across genotype and location (CVG×L), and across genotype within year [CVG (Y)] or across genotype and year (CVG×Y). ES in the scheme on top refers to the estimation set, TS represents the test set. In each case, the dataset was divided into five subsets (S1-S5), of which S1 to S4 were assigned to the ES and S5 to the TS. The mean accuracy of prediction rp values for genomic selection based on data from population A (Pop-A) and population B (Pop-B) for traits grain yield and plant height are shown below. The mean rp across genotype based on the eight location-year combinations for which data from two years could be included (BEK10, BEK11, PET10, PET11, WAL10, WAL11, WOH10, WOH11; excluding HOH10) serves as reference (CVG; white). The mean rp across genotype within location [CVG (L)] or across genotype and location (CVG×L) was determined by selecting data from two locations in the years 2010 and 2011 (e.g. BEK10, BEK11, PET10, PET11) for estimation, the mean rp across genotype within year [CVG (Y)], or across genotype and year (CVG×Y) from estimation sets based on data from four locations in one year (e.g. BEK10, PET10, WAL10, WOH10). Test sets were derived either from the same location-year combinations as the estimation sets [CVG (L); light grey; CVG (Y); dark grey] or from the location-year combinations not used for estimation (CVG×L; intermediate grey; CVG×Y; black).

Back to article page