Skip to main content

Table 7 Predictive abilities between observed and predicted values for 9 spatial and non-spatial models (M1, , M9) and mixed datasets using the best locations given the AIC (Mix1) and the ρ -GP-CV per location-year combination (Mix2)

From: The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye

 

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

M7

M8

M9

Mix1

Mix 2

WC

0.700

0.694

0.691

0.679

0.692

0.692

0.691

0.694

0.689

0.689

0.690

 

a

ab

ab

c

ab

ab

ab

ab

abc

bc

abc

AC

0.395

0.398

0.390

0.395

0.391

0.389

0.389

0.395

0.391

0.391

0.390

 

b

a

cd

de

c

e

de

b

c

c

cd

  1. Same letters within rows indicate no significant differences (α=5%) according to a paired t-test. Sampling strategies were: Within crosses (WC) and across crosses (AC).