Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of chicken CNVRs identified in this study and in previous studies using 385 K NimbleGen whole genome-tiling arrays

From: Identification and functional characterization of copy number variations in diverse chicken breeds

Study

Chicken CNVRs identified in this study and in previous studies

Overlaps with this study

Platform

Samples

Breeds/Species

CNVR

Range (kb)

Median (kb)

Mean (kb)

Total length (Mb)

Count*

Percentage

Total length (kb)

Percentage

Griffin et al. [34]

385 k NimbleGen

2

2

21

18.77–900.00

90.00

141.83

2.84

6

2.14

418.06

3.27

Völker et al. [29]

385 k NimbleGen

1

2

27

20.15–950.00

127.10

211.77

5.29

3

1.07

710.00

5.55

Wang et al. [32]

385 k NimbleGen

10

3

91

10.30–2030.06

42.59

157.17

15.72

14

4.98

814.91

6.37

Wang et al. [31]

400 k Agilent

6

3

130

6.20–649.12

14.43

25.70

3.34

12

4.27

339.79

2.65

Tian et al. [28]

400 k Agilent

22

11

308

5.82 –2025.34

14.6

35.1

10.8

29

10.32

818.53

6.39

Crooijmans et al. [33]

Agilent244K

64

15

1556

4.87-4365.80

26.0

45.2

70.1

50

17.79

2151.12

16.81

This study

385 k NimbleGen

10

5

281

9.63–1522.58

25.0

45.6

12.8

—

—

—

—

  1. *:The number of CNVRs identified in the present study that have been previously reported.