Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the results reported for the 1189 benchmark (in percentage %)

From: Proposing a highly accurate protein structural class predictor using segmentation-based features

References

Method

All-α

All-β

α/β

α+ β

Overall

[8]

Bayes Classifier

54.8

57.1

75.2

22.2

53.8

[45]

Logistic Regression

57.0

62.9

64.7

25.3

53.9

[56]

FKNN

48.9

59.5

81.7

26.6

56.9

[57]

WSVM

-

-

-

-

59.2

[53]

Specific Tri-peptides

-

-

-

-

59.9

[21]

IB1

65.3

67.7

79.9

40.7

64.7

[38]

AAD-CGR

62.3

67.7

66.5

63.1

65.2

[58]

SVM

75.8

75.2

82.6

31.8

67.6

[54]

AATP

72.7

85.4

82.9

42.7

72.6

[16]

AADP-PSSM

69.1

83.7

85.6

35.7

70.7

[55]

SCPRED

89.1

86.7

89.6

53.8

80.6

[24]

RKS-PPSC

89.2

86.7

82.6

65.6

81.3

[27]

MODAS

92.3

87.1

87.9

65.4

83.5

[26]

AAC-PSSM-AC

80.7

86.4

81.4

45.2

74.6

[22]

Physicochemical-based features

80.2

83.6

85.4

44.6

74.8

[5]

Structural-based features

92.4

87.4

82.0

71.0

83.2

[6]

Structural-based features

93.7

84.0

83.5

66.4

82.0

This Study

PSSM-S

92.6

86.0

76.7

64.3

79.7

This Study

SPINE-S

91.9

88.3

78.9

61.7

80.3

This Study

PSSM-SPINE-S

98.2

91.5

83.8

72.2

86.3