Table 2 Results for Yersinia enterocolitica.
From: Efficient and scalable scaffolding using optical restriction maps
Contigs | Method | Missed probability | % Resize | Conflicts | Wrong placement | % Accuracy | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 | GPA1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 43.37 |
| Â | Â | 0.1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 97.50 | 43.97 |
| Â | Â | 0.2 | 10 | 18 | 0 | 91.00 | 38.92 |
| Â | Â | 0.3 | 20 | 92 | 4 | 51.00 | 28.32 |
| Â | GPA2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 46.41 |
| Â | Â | 0.1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 98.50 | 45.47 |
| Â | Â | 0.2 | 10 | 11 | 6 | 91.50 | 32.71 |
| Â | Â | 0.3 | 20 | 84 | 10 | 53.00 | 32.29 |
| Â | GPA3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 41.10 |
| Â | Â | 0.1 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 96.00 | 43.61 |
| Â | Â | 0.2 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 94.50 | 40.41 |
| Â | Â | 0.3 | 20 | 57 | 7 | 68.00 | 31.87 |
400 | GPA1 | 0.0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 97.75 | 46.67 |
| Â | Â | 0.1 | 5 | 17 | 1 | 95.50 | 45.02 |
| Â | Â | 0.2 | 10 | 45 | 1 | 88.50 | 37.00 |
| Â | Â | 0.3 | 20 | 111 | 18 | 67.75 | 32.95 |
| Â | GPA2 | 0.0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 97.25 | 46.66 |
| Â | Â | 0.1 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 92.50 | 49.04 |
| Â | Â | 0.2 | 10 | 50 | 22 | 82.00 | 33.21 |
| Â | Â | 0.3 | 20 | 135 | 26 | 59.75 | 31.90 |
| Â | GPA3 | 0.0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 97.75 | 43.89 |
| Â | Â | 0.1 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 96.25 | 36.04 |
| Â | Â | 0.2 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 91.50 | 33.53 |
| Â | Â | 0.3 | 20 | 54 | 23 | 80.75 | 33.04 |