HGT candidate | Number of homologous sequences useda | BLAST identity threshold | BLAST coverage cut-off | Topology changes with different number of sequencesb | Topology changes after editing alignment | Best model | Topology tests (supporting HGT)c | Similarities between ML and BI tree reconstruction (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGT1 | 44 | 40 | 90 | No | No | LG + I + G + F | ELW, SH | 83 |
HGT2 | 42 | 35 | 85 | Yes | No | LG + G + F | n.a. | 92 |
HGT3 | 54 | 41 | 96 | Yes | No | LG + G | ELW | 100 |
HGT4 | 43 | 40 | 90 | No | No | LG + G + F | n.a. | 93 |
HGT5 | 53 | 54 | 97 | No | No | LG+G+F | n.a. | 96 |
HGT6 | 46 | 44 | 90 | Yes | No | WAG + G + F | n.a. | 95 |
HGT7 | 37 | 35 | 85 | No | No | LG + I + G + F | ELW, SH | 84 |
HGT8 | 47 | 28 | 92 | No | No | LG + I + G + F | ELW, SH | 93 |
HGT9 | 50 | 37 | 90 | No | No | LG + G + F | ELW, SH | 81 |
HGT10 | 39 | 30 | 75 | No | No | LG + G + F | ELW, SH | 97 |
HGT11 | 44 | 30 | 80 | No | No | LG + G + F | ELW, SH | 89 |