Skip to main content

Table 4 Real data estimation results using HBM and MLM

From: Mixture SNPs effect on phenotype in genome-wide association studies

 

The Framingham heart studya

The health and retirement studyb

 

Estimates from

Estimates from

Estimates from

Estimates from

Parameter

HBM (s.e)b

MLM (s.e)b

HBM (s.e)b

MLM (s.e)b

(Intercept)

26.42 (0.29)

26.46 (0.28)

27.47 (0.07)

27.47 (0.05)

0.20 (0.09)

0.014 (0.005)

0.014 (0.009)

0.0001 (0.00002)

24.68 (0.38)

22.64 (0.41)

22.32 (0.23)

27.29 (0.41)

1.49 (0.40)

3.49 (0.35)

0.6678 (0.4)

0.95 (0.38)

0.0034 (0.0005) c

-

0.0042 (0.0004) c

-

PVE

0.06 (0.01) d

0.13 (0.01) d

0.026 (0.01)

0.04 (0.01)

PC1

-19.01 (44.72)

-10.90 (44.15)

82.75 (33.56)

91.66 (20.10)

PC2

-18.00 (24.41)

-18.27 (24.90)

-15.54 (8.52)

-18.41 (10.49)

PC3

2.63 (8.91)

5.65 (10.25)

26.01 (9.32)

23.01 (6.91)

PC4

-10.13 (9.11)

-10.05 (9.45)

3.52 (3.24)

2.24 (6.83)

PC5

18.55 (9.44)

19.80 (9.89)

14.43 (11.14)

8.49 (6.79)

PC6

-4.75 (12.17)

-4.49 (12.02)

-9.77 (14.34)

-19.81 (6.77)

PC7

16.06 (12.46)

13.09 (12.48)

-1.21 (11.95)

-2.39 (6.74)

  1. aThe analysis is based on 1,915 unrelated persons in the Framingham Heart data set using 13,764 SNPs on Chromosome 16 to predict BMI. bThe analysis is based on 12,237 unrelated persons in the Health and Retirement Study using 11,925 SNPs on Chromosome 16 to predict BMI. cValues in the parenthesis are standard errors. dPVE estimated by MLM is higher than that estimated by HBM.