Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of classification accuracy using top 100 features for platform transition.

From: Evaluation of data discretization methods to derive platform independent isoform expression signatures for multi-class tumor subtyping

Feature selection

CV (%)

SVM-RFE (%)

RF_based_FS (%)

Classifier

FC

Equal-W

Equal-F

k-means

FC

Equal-W

Equal-F

k-means

FC

Equal-W

Equal-F

k-means

SVM

40.8

26.3

84.2

81.6

36.8

40.8

85.5

39.5

28.9

30.2

76.3

39.5

RF

67.1

73.7

89.5

76.3

55.2

60.5

86.8

80.2

56.6

81.6

90.8

85.5

NB

25.0

23.7

80.2

71.0

32.9

23.7

76.3

22.3

23.7

23.7

84.2

36.8

PAM

35.5

23.7

78.9

64.5

39.5

27.6

73.7

32.9

39.5

23.7

81.6

44.7

  1. The classification models were trained on exon-array (342 samples) and tested on RNA-seq (76 samples) data. Highest accuracy for each classification method is marked in bold. Only RF with Equal-F binning achieved greater than 90% classification accuracy.