Skip to main content

Table 4 Ranking comparison for 15% threshold level; between positive correlation, inverse correlation and all together.

From: A novel analysis strategy for integrating methylation and expression data reveals core pathways for thyroid cancer aetiology

 

Model 7

(>15% Methylation Change, Significances Combined)

Model 8

(>15% Methylation Change, Inverse Correlated,Significances Combined)

Model 9

(>15% Methylation Change, Positively Correlated,Significances Combined)

KEGG TERMs

Pooled Dataset

Pooled Dataset

Pooled Dataset

MAPK Signalling

6

59

7

ECM Receptor

3

7

4

ErbB Signalling

10

4

5

NF-KB Signalling

22

11

-

Wnt-β-Catenin Signalling

72

-

-

VEGF Signalling

30

60

53

Thyroid Cancer

45

65

27

Adherens Junction

14

10

11

p53 Signalling

54

25

-

TGF-beta Signalling

13

-

42

Notch Signalling

12

55

49

GnRH Signalling

56

37

50

Neurotrophin Signalling

17

21

6

Focal Adhesion

2

2

1

Transcr. Misregulation

51

65

-

Apoptosis

4

1

-

Pathways in Cancer

1

3

3

Toll-like receptor signalling pathway

8

5

-

Pentose-phosphate pathway

18

17

15

  1. Rankings of KEGG functional enrichment results on pooled dataset to investigate the differences between positive and inverse correlation. When only inverse correlated genes were taken, we observed 9 pathways in top 20 rankings and when only positively correlated genes were taken, we observed 8 pathways in top 20 rankings. On the other hand, when no filter applied and all genes above the 15% threshold were taken, we reached the optimal analysis model with 12 pathways in top 20.