Skip to main content

Table 3 Cross-species amplification results for 50 primer pairs with no IS-mismatches

From: Design factors that influence PCR amplification success of cross-species primers among 1147 mammalian primer pairs

Gene

Huma

Mon

Dog

Cat

Hor

Cow

Goa

Pig

Ham

Rat

Mou

prot idb

GCc

Notesd

PTBP2

4 e

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

99

32.8c

 

HAT1

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

93

39.6

 

PTPRU

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

95

54.8

 

MACF1

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

78

37.8

 

FRAP1

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

99

39.9

 

LRP1B

4

4

3

4

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

91

39.5

 

LYST

4

4

4

3

3

4

4

4

4

4

0

84

28.6

 

HNRPU

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

94

39.6

 

SLC20A1

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

90

39.4

 

RND3

4

4

0

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

100

51.6

 

CDC7

4

2

4

4

4

4

4

4

2

4

0

81

33.6

 

PABPC4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

3

2

2

95

51.2

 

NR4A2

4

4

4

3

0

4

4

4

4

4

4

99

43.9

 

KYNU

3

4

4

3

4

4

4

0

4

4

4

85

30.5

 

DDX18

4

4

0

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

85

39.4

 

CLCN6

4

4

4

4

4

0

4

3

3

4

4

96

52.7

1d

PSCDBP

4

4

3

4

4

0

4

3

4

4

4

81

37.4

 

ABCA4

4

4

2

4

4

4

4

2

3

2

3

88

53.5

 

MDH1

4

4

4

4

4

4

2

2

4

2

4

96

39.5

 

ADD2

4

4

0

4

4

4

2

4

2

4

4

94

51.9

 

CTNNA2

4

4

4

4

4

0

0

4

3

4

4

98

45.6

 

SLC1A4

4

4

4

4

2

2

4

2

2

3

4

89

51.8

 

LAMC1

4

4

4

4

0

4

4

0

4

2

4

92

37.9

 

FASLG

4

4

4

2

4

4

4

4

0

0

0

77

40.1

 

HK2

2

4

4

4

3

0

3

0

4

4

4

94

46.5

2

ORC4L

3

3

3

4

3

3

3

0

3

4

3

88

33.2

 

CCT7

2

4

2

2

1

4

4

4

2

2

4

95

46.2

2

FLVCR

4

4

4

4

4

0

4

1

0

4

0

77

39.0

1

ITGAV

4

4

0

4

4

4

4

4

0

0

0

91

36.4

 

MYO1B

4

4

4

4

0

0

0

4

4

4

4

89

31.5

 

RGS16

4

4

1

4

3

4

4

4

0

0

0

84

44.7

 

PINK1

4

4

0

2

4

3

1

1

4

4

4

81

48.9

 

EIF5B

4

4

4

4

3

0

0

4

3

1

4

75

38.7

1

GNB1

3

4

4

4

4

0

3

0

3

0

3

100

51.6

 

GDAP2

4

4

3

4

0

0

0

3

4

4

4

94

35.0

 

BIN1

0

3

3

3

0

3

3

3

0

3

3

69

60.8

3

WDR8

4

4

4

4

0

0

0

0

4

4

4

89

35.0

 

AP4B1

4

4

4

0

4

0

0

0

3

4

4

90

39.0

 

CYP2J2

4

4

1

4

3

3

0

2

0

2

0

76

43.7

1

GABRD

0

1

2

2

1

2

2

0

4

4

4

91

64.0

3

SULT1C1

4

4

4

4

4

0

0

0

0

2

0

83

45.9

1

RBBP4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

99

38.8

2

DVL

0

0

4

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

4

95

69.6

3

SAC

4

0

0

4

4

0

0

0

4

4

3

73

45.0

 

CCNT2

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

4

4

4

4

69

54.6

3

JAK1

4

0

0

4

0

0

3

4

4

0

4

93

52.4

 

TBR1

0

3

0

2

0

1

1

2

3

3

3

99

53.4

3

WDR39

1

0

0

2

1

0

1

0

3

4

4

94

54.1

3

ARID4B

1

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

3

1

87

35.7

3

STAT1

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

4

92

39.9

4

  1. aBoxes indicate index species used to design primers. Species abbreviations are: Hum, human; Mon, monkey; Hor, horse; Goa, goat; Ham, hamster; Mou, mouse.
  2. aThese numbers are the percent protein sequence identity between human and mouse.
  3. cThese numbers are the G + C content in the e-PCR amplified human product.
  4. dNotes: 1, rabbit was the second index species for these primer pairs, except FLVCR, for which cat was used; 2, one or more processed pseudogenes apparent in the human genome; 3, contains a > 130 bp window in amplified human product with > 59% G + C; 4, strong primer-dimer seen in amplifications.
  5. eNumbers 0–4 correspond to amplification rankings as exemplified in Fig. 1.