Skip to main content

Table 1 General Comparison between T2 and HAPim.

From: Linkage disequilibrium interval mapping of quantitative trait loci

Marker type N Marker spacing MSE Difference in MSE P value
    T2 HAPim  
SNP (1) 200 2 cM 5.10 5.08 0.948
  400 2 cM 4.69 5.04 0.366
  200 0.25 cM 2.00 1.24 < 0.001**
  400 0.25 cM 1.34 0.92 0.005**
MST (2) 200 2 cM 2.93 2.77 0.438
  400 2 cM 1.81 1.44 0.056
  200 0.25 cM 0.71 0.46 0.012*
  400 0.25 cM 0.49 0.30 0.033*
  1. * : P < 0.05, ** : P < 0.01
  2. (1) : single nucleotide polymorphism
  3. (2) : microsatellite
  4. Mean square errors (MSEs) in cM2 of quantitative trait locus (QTL) location estimates obtained by the T2 and HAPim methods for various effective population sizes, marker spacings and marker types, t = 100 and the initial association was complete.