Skip to main content

Table 1 General Comparison between T2 and HAPim.

From: Linkage disequilibrium interval mapping of quantitative trait loci

Marker type

N

Marker spacing

MSE

Difference in MSE P value

   

T2

HAPim

 

SNP (1)

200

2 cM

5.10

5.08

0.948

 

400

2 cM

4.69

5.04

0.366

 

200

0.25 cM

2.00

1.24

< 0.001**

 

400

0.25 cM

1.34

0.92

0.005**

MST (2)

200

2 cM

2.93

2.77

0.438

 

400

2 cM

1.81

1.44

0.056

 

200

0.25 cM

0.71

0.46

0.012*

 

400

0.25 cM

0.49

0.30

0.033*

  1. * : P < 0.05, ** : P < 0.01
  2. (1) : single nucleotide polymorphism
  3. (2) : microsatellite
  4. Mean square errors (MSEs) in cM2 of quantitative trait locus (QTL) location estimates obtained by the T2 and HAPim methods for various effective population sizes, marker spacings and marker types, t = 100 and the initial association was complete.