Spatial and temporal expression of the 23 murine Prolactin/Placental Lactogen-related genes is not associated with their position in the locus
© Simmons et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 25 March 2008
Accepted: 28 July 2008
Published: 28 July 2008
The Prolactin (PRL) hormone gene family shows considerable variation among placental mammals. Whereas there is a single PRL gene in humans that is expressed by the pituitary, there are an additional 22 genes in mice including the placental lactogens (PL) and Prolactin-related proteins (PLPs) whose expression is limited to the placenta. To understand the regulation and potential functions of these genes, we conducted a detailed temporal and spatial expression study in the placenta between embryonic days 7.5 and E18.5 in three genetic strains.
Of the 22 PRL/PL genes examined, only minor differences were observed among strains of mice. We found that not one family member has the same expression pattern as another when both temporal and spatial data were examined. There was also no correlation in expression between genes that were most closely related or between adjacent genes in the PRL/PL locus. Bioinformatic analysis of upstream regulatory regions identified conserved combinations (modules) of putative transcription factor binding sites shared by genes expressed in the same trophoblast subtype, supporting the notion that local regulatory elements, rather than locus control regions, specify subtype-specific expression. Further diversification in expression was also detected as splice variants for several genes.
In the present study, a detailed temporal and spatial placental expression map was generated for all murine PRL/PL family members from E7.5 to E18.5 of gestation in three genetic strains. This detailed analysis uncovered several new markers for some trophoblast cell types that will be useful for future analysis of placental structure in mutant mice with placental phenotypes. More importantly, several main conclusions about regulation of the locus are apparent. First, no two family members have the same expression pattern when both temporal and spatial data are examined. Second, most genes are expressed in multiple trophoblast cell subtypes though none were detected in the chorion, where trophoblast stem cells reside, or in syncytiotrophoblast of the labyrinth layer. Third, bioinformatic comparisons of upstream regulatory regions identified predicted transcription factor binding site modules that are shared by genes expressed in the same trophoblast subtype. Fourth, further diversification of gene products from the PRL/PL locus occurs through alternative splice isoforms for several genes.
The closely related Prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone genes are thought to have arisen from a common ancestral gene as a result of gene duplication and subsequent divergence early in vertebrate evolution . Further gene duplications have given rise to expanded growth hormone or PRL clusters in a species-specific manner. Primates, for example, have an expanded growth hormone locus (containing five genes in close proximity on Ch 17) but a single PRL gene. In contrast, rodents have a single growth hormone gene but an amplified PRL locus containing 23 PRL-like genes in mice [2–4] and at least 25 in the rat , all located in close proximity in a single locus. While many of the genes in the mouse and rat PRL family are orthologues, some are specific to either species indicating gene duplications since the divergence of mice and rats. Amplification of the PRL gene appears to have happened independently at least twice in mammals as ruminants have an expanded PRL locus whose members are not orthologous to those of the rodent PRL family [3, 6–8].
Standardized nomenclature for the mouse PRL/PL family
PRL Family Gene Name
Official Alias Symbol
Mouse Genbank Accession No.
Prolactin family 2, subfamily a, member 1
Prolactin family 2, subfamily b, member 1
Prolactin family 2, subfamily c, member 2
Prolactin family 2, subfamily c, member 3
Prolactin family 2, subfamily c, member 4
Prolactin family 2, subfamily c, member 5
Prolactin family 3, subfamily a, member 1
Prolactin family 3, subfamily b, member 1
Prolactin family 3, subfamily c, member 1
Prolactin family 3, subfamily d, member 1
Prolactin family 3, subfamily d, member 2
Prolactin family 3, subfamily d, member 3
Prolactin family 4, subfamily a, member 1
Prolactin family 5, subfamily a, member 1
Prolactin family 6, subfamily a, member 1
Prolactin family 7, subfamily a, member 1
Prolactin family 7, subfamily a, member 2
Prolactin family 7, subfamily b, member 1
Prolactin family 7, subfamily c, member 1
Prolactin family 7, subfamily d, member 1
Prolactin family 8, subfamily a, member 1
Prolactin family 8, subfamily a, member 2
Prolactin family 8, subfamily a, member 6
Prolactin family 8, subfamily a, member 8
Prolactin family 8, subfamily a, member 9
The Placental Lactogen proteins (now called Prl3b and Prl3d) bind to the PRL receptor and mimic the actions of pituitary PRL , which include multiple pregnancy-dependent processes such as mammary gland development, corpus luteum function , maternal behavior  and pancreas function . However, the additional PRL/PL-related proteins are 'non-classical' members of the PRL family as they do not bind and activate the PRL receptor, although receptor-binding activity for several members has not yet been investigated. Overall, the biological targets and functions are known for only a few of the PRL/PL-related proteins. Prl2c (Proliferin)  and Prl7d1 (Proliferin-related protein)  have angiogenic and anti-angiogenic effects on endothelial cells, respectively . Prl7a1 (PLP-E) and Prl7a2 (PLP-F) promote blood cell production [21, 22]. Prl4a1 (PLP-A) suppresses natural killer cells . The only mouse mutants that have been reported so far are for Prl4a1  and Prl8a2 (dPRP) . Neither mouse mutant shows an obvious phenotype under normal conditions but embryonic lethality ensues when pregnant mice are exposed to hypoxia. This implies either that the PRL/PL-related genes have evolved to respond to physiological stress or alternatively that redundancy within the gene family minimizes the effects of single gene mutations.
The human growth hormone locus relies on a locus control region 15–32 kilobases upstream to drive tissue-specific expression [26, 27]. Within the PRL/PL locus in rodents, however, there is no evidence so far for similar control of regulation and no correlation between gene location within the PRL/PL locus and temporal or spatial expression patterns within the placenta has been observed . Placental expression data for most of the murine PRL family members has been reported [4, 25, 28–34], although almost exclusively at mid-gestation, and comprehensive temporal and spatial expression data for all 23 members of the PRL/PL family has not yet been compiled. We have recently expanded on trophoblast cell type classifications within the murine placenta . Our objective here was to generate a high-resolution map of PRL/PL expression patterns and explore associations between co-expressed genes and their respective positions within the locus and/or similarities in regulatory elements.
cDNAs with the full length open reading frames for each PRL/PL family member were used as probes for northern blot and in situ hybridization. cDNAs for Prl3b1, Prl2c1, Prl7d1 were kindly provided by Dr. J. Rossant. cDNAs for Prl3d1, Prl8a2, Prl4a1, Prl6a1, Prl7a1, Prl3c1, Prl5a1 were kindly provided by Dr. D. Linzer. cDNAs for Prl8a9, Prl8a8, Prl3a1, Prl2b1, Prl2a1, Prl7b1, Prl7c1 were kindly provided by Dr. M. Soares. Full length cDNAs for Prl, Prl8a6, Prl8a1, Prl7a2, and Pcdh12 were generated by PCR: Prl (forward 5'-CTCTCAGGCCATCTTGGAGA-3', reverse 5'-TAAGCAGTTGTTTTGATGGGC-3); Prl8a6 (forward 5'-ACGATGGCACTGCTATTGAGT-3', reverse 5'-TGGAGCATTTTCAAAGCAGA-3'); Prl8a1 (forward 5'-CAAAGATGGTGCTGCCATTA-3', reverse 5'-CCCAGTTATGCGACATTTCA-3'); Prl7a2 (forward 5'-GCCAGAACTCTTCAGAGATGTC-3', reverse 5'-TTAAGCATCATGAAGCATCTCT3'); Pcdh12 (forward 5'-CAATGGGAATCCCCCTAAGT-3', reverse 5'-TAGGTGGTCCACACTGGTGA-3'). PCR fragments were cloned into pGEM-T easy (Promega) and sequence verified.
PCR primers and conditions
Primers and conditions for isoform-specific PCR analysis
PCR Primer Name
1.5 mM MgCl2, 35 cycles, 60°C annealing
Prl6a1 common reverse
Prl6a1 novel forward
1.5 mM MgCl2, 30 cycles, 60°C annealing (Novel forward rxn – 35 cycles)
Prl8a6 common reverse
Prl8a6 novel forward
2.0 mM MgCl2, 35 cycles, 46°C annealing (Novel forward rxn – 1.5 mM MgCl2)
Prl8a8 common reverse
Prl8a8 novel forward
1.5 mM MgCl2, 30 cycles, 60°C annealing
Prl8a1 common forward
Prl8a1 novel reverse
2.0 mM MgCl2, 28 cycles, 60°C annealing (Novel reverse rxn 32 cycles)
Prl7a1 common forward
Prl7a1 novel reverse
Phylogenetic analysis and transcription factor binding site analysis
cDNA sequences of the 23 paralogous PRL/PL family members were input into the Mega 3.1 software program to generate a phylogenetic tree . Three kilobases of upstream promoter regions of paralogous PRL/PL family members were analyzed for transcription factor binding sites by using the Toucan 2 software program .
Northern blot analysis
Northern blot analysis was performed as previously described . Briefly, RNA was extracted by using Trizol (Invitrogen), separated on a 1.1% formaldehyde gel and transferred to nylon membranes (Perkin Elmer). After UV cross-linking, the membranes were hybridized in Church buffer  containing 32P-labeled cDNA probes. An 18S ribosomal RNA probe was used to check for RNA integrity and standardize for gel loading.
In situ hybridization
Placentae were dissected in cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C. After rinsing in PBS, tissues were processed through sucrose gradients (10% in PBS and 25% in PBS) before being embedded in OCT (Tissue Tek). Ten μm sections were cut and mounted on Super Frost Plus slides (VWR) and stored at -80°C. For in situ hybridization, sections were re-hydrated in PBS, post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, treated with proteinase K (30 μg/ml) for 10 minutes at room temperature, acetylated for 10 minutes (acetic anhydride, 0.25%; Sigma) and hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled probes overnight at 65°C. Digoxigenin labeling was done according to the manufacturers instructions (Roche). Hybridization buffer contained 1× salts (200 mM sodium choride, 13 mM tris, 5 mM sodium phosphate monobasic, 5 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 5 mM EDTA), 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1 mg/ml yeast tRNA (Roche), 1× Denhardt's (1% w/v bovine serum albumin, 1% w/v Ficoll, 1% w/v polyvinylpyrrolidone), and DIG-labeled probe (final dilution of 1:2000 from reaction with 1 μg template DNA). Two 65°C post-hybridization washes (1× SSC, 50% formamide, 0.1% tween-20) followed by two room temperature washes in 1× MABT (150 mM sodium chloride, 100 mM maleic acid, 0.1% tween-20, pH7.5) were followed by 30 minutes RNAse treatment (400 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM tris pH7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 20 μg/ml RNAse A). Sections were blocked in 1× MABT, 2% blocking reagent (Roche), 20% heat inactivated goat serum for 1 hour and incubated overnight in block with anti-DIG antibody (Roche) at a 1:2500 dilution at 4°C. After four 20 minute washes in 1× MABT, slides were rinsed in 1× NTMT (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl, 100 mM tris pH 9.5, 0.1% tween-20) and incubated in NBT/BCIP in NTMT according to the manufacturers instructions (Promega). Slides were counterstained with nuclear fast red, dehydrated and cleared in xylene and mounted in cytoseal mounting medium (VWR).
For double labeled in situ hybridizations, a fluorescein-labeled probe was generated following the manufacturers instructions (Roche) and added to the hybridization mix along with the DIG-labeled probe. Following NBT/BCIP development of the first probe, the antibody-enzyme conjugate was inactivated by 30 min incubation in 1× MABT at 65°C, followed by 30 min in 0.1 M glycine pH 2.2 at room temperature. The slides were then blocked again in 1× MABT, 2% blocking reagent (Roche), 20% heat inactivated goat serum for 1 hour and incubated overnight in block with anti-Fluorescein antibody (Roche) at a 1:2500 dilution at 4°C. The second signal was developed as previously described but one modification, the substrate INT/BCIP (Roche), producing a brown colour, was used in place of NBT/BCIP. As the INT/BCIP is soluble in alcohols and xylene, slides were counterstained with nuclear fast red and mounted directly under Crystal Mount Aqueous Mounting Medium (Sigma).
PRL/PL Family Nomenclature and Expression Analysis
A revised system for naming members of the mouse and rat PRL/PL gene families has recently been introduced  and is used throughout (see Table 1). Our analysis was aimed at being able to discriminate the patterns of expression of all 23 genes in the PRL/PL locus. However, the similarity of some family members precluded us form being able to do this for both spatial and temporal analysis. For example, the new nomenclature cites four additional murine Prl2c (Proliferin) genes (Prl2c2, Prl2c3, Prl2c4, and Prl2c5) since four cDNAs have been reported, but the actual number of genes and their respective locations within the genome remain a matter of debate. Differentiation among the various Prl2c cDNAs requires RT-PCR analysis followed by restriction enzyme digestion of the resultant amplicons [39–41]. Therefore, as the methodology used in the current study (cDNA probe for Prl2c1 used in northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization) could not discriminate expression from the various Prl2c genes or isoforms, hypothesized or annotated, the data for all genes was summarized as Prl2c. Similarly, data for Prl3d1, Prl3d2 and Prl3d3 (Placental Lactogen I alpha, beta and gamma) are summarized as Prl3d.
Expression Profiles for PRL/PL Family Members Throughout Placental Development
In general, because of the inclusion of numerous gestational time points and detailed spatial analysis, our analysis generated new expression information for all family members. However, three family members showed discrepancies with previously published data. Prl3c1 (Prolactin-like protein J) is expressed in the antimesometrial decidua early in pregnancy and lasts as long as the antimesometrial decidual tissue persists [25, 31]. In the current study, Prl3c1 expression was also detected in the mesometrial decidua, although to a lesser extent, and in spongiotrophoblast at mid-gestation (see Additional file 3). Prl8a1 (Prolactin-like protein C delta) expression was not detected in the migratory glycogen trophoblast cells at mid-gestation (see Additional file 12), or as strongly in the spongiotrophoblast cells compared to a previous report . Finally, Prl7c1 (Prolactin-like protein O) has been reported to be expressed in spongiotrophoblast, TGCs and the labyrinth  but in the present study Prl7c1 expression was detected in the ectoplacental cone early in gestation and was then restricted to glycogen trophoblast cells later in gestation, although by E12.5 expression was very much reduced (see Additional file 17). Some of these differences could be explained by differences in the use of in situ hybridization compared with immunohistochemistry or with the use of different in situ hybridization probes or sensitivity, but the significant discrepancy regarding Prl7c1 expression is more difficult to reconcile. We have re-sequenced all of our cDNA plasmids to confirm that we used the correct probes.
No Correlation Between the Spatial/Temporal Expression Profiles of PRL/PL Family Members and their Position within the Locus or Sequence Similarity
In comparing the expression profiles of the genes in the PRL/PL locus, each gene had a largely unique pattern when considering both spatial and temporal expression. By aligning the expression patterns with an evolutionary tree based on gene sequence similarity (Fig. 2B) or with position along the locus (see Additional file 1), it was clear that there were no obvious patterns. This was true regardless of the phylogenetic methodology applied or the nature of the comparison (cDNA versus amino acid sequence).
Expression of Numerous Prolactin Family Members within the Ectoplacental Cone
Glycogen Trophoblast or Spongiotrophoblast-Specific Expression
Common Regulatory Modules Within Unique Gene Promoter Regions Likely Convey Trophoblast Subtype-Specific Gene Expression
Multiple Splice Variants for Some PRL/PL Family Members
The mouse genome sequence assemblies from the Ensembl  (m36-Jun2006) and Vega  (v19-Jun2006) databases predict the existence of splice variants for several PRL/PL family members, including Prl6a1, Prl8a6, Prl8a8, Prl8a1 and Prl7a1. In an effort to determine whether the predicted isoforms were expressed in vivo, sequences unique to each variant cDNA were used both to search EST databases and for primer design for RT-PCR analysis and cDNA sequencing.
The novel splice variant of Prl8a6, predicted by both the Ensembl (transcript ENSMUST00000080762) and Vega (Prl8a6-001) genome assemblies, has a unique 5' untranslated region (UTR) and an absence of exon 4 (Fig. 6). EST database searches using the predicted cDNA identified an EST from a placental cDNA library that was a perfect match (accession AK005478), suggesting that this isoform is expressed in vivo. RT-PCR analysis using primers flanking exon 4 produced two amplicons (Fig. 6) and sequencing of the PCR products revealed that the major upper band contained exon 4 and the lower band did not contain exon 4. Database searches revealed numerous ESTs that contained the novel 5' UTR sequence but were not missing exon 4. Since the entire published 5' UTR (transcript ENSMUST00000018392) is contained within predicted novel 5' UTR (ENSMUST00000080762), it is possible that the novel 5' UTR is not unique but reflects the incomplete 5' sequencing of ESTs in the databases corresponding to Prl8a6. However, RT-PCR analysis using a forward primer specific to the predicted 5' UTR of ENSMUST00000080762 produced a fragment which was expressed only at E14.5 and not at E9.5, suggesting that the novel 5' UTR sequence could be isoform specific (data not shown).
Originally annotated and confirmed as a six exon gene, Ensembl and Vega assemblies both predict an additional isoform of Prl8a8 containing a novel exon between exons 1 and 2 (transcript ENSMUST00000018016) (Fig 6). NCBI database searches indicated 3 ESTs that contained the novel exon (accession CK022447, CK032606, CK020277) as well as over 33 ESTs that did not. The novel isoform had already been submitted to Genbank as Prl8a8 isoform2 (accession AF230923). RT-PCR analysis and sequencing of the PCR products confirmed expression of both isoforms in E14.5 placenta (Fig 6).
An alternative isoform of Prl8a1 was predicted by both Ensembl (transcript ENSMUST00000095926) and Vega to terminate with an extended exon 5 rather than with exon 6, as is the case for the originally reported Prl8a1 (transcript ENSMUST00000006664) (Fig. 6). Searches of the NCBI and TIGR EST databases revealed an EST that was a 100% match with the predicted Prl8a1 novel isoform (accession AK014414). Our RT-PCR analysis indicated that both isoforms are expressed at E9.5 and E14.5, although similar to Prl8a8, the novel isoform is expressed at a lower level (Fig. 6).
An alternative isoform of Prl7a1 was predicted by the Ensembl assembly (transcript ENSMUST00000095924) to terminate with an extended exon 6 rather than with exon 7, as is the case for the originally reported Prl7a1 (transcript ENSMUST00000006659) (Fig. 6). An EST search returned a match with the novel isoform (accession AK028371). In addition, RT-PCR using primers specific to either the extended exon 6 or to exon 7, coupled with a common forward primer for exon2, could amplify transcripts from both isoforms (confirmed by sequencing) at E9.5 and E14.5 (Fig. 6).
Multiple Prl2c Genes Exist, Located Both Inside and Outside the PRL/PL Family Locus
Between four and six Prl2c genes are predicted to exist within the mouse genome [51, 52]. Four unique cDNAs have been described [40, 41, 52], which correspond to the four Prl2c genes currently annotated in the mouse genome: Prl2c2, Prl2c3, Prl2c4 and Prl2c5. Notably, all of these four genes are located outside of the main PRL/PL locus but are still on chromosome 13. Three of the genes are located approximately 10 Mb away from the main PRL/PL locus; Prl2c4 is found at 12.88 Mb, Prl2c2 (MRP-1/Plf-1) is found at 13.09 Mb and Prl2c5 (Formerly Mrpplf4, MRP-4 and Plf-4) at 13.27 Mb (Fig 2), representing a Prl2c cluster outside the boundaries of the main PRL/PL locus. Some discrepancies and confusion remain regarding the Prl2c genes, however, as searches of Ensembl show that Prl2c3 is listed as an alternative name for Prl2c4 (also formerly Mrpplf3, MRP-2, Plf-2 and Plf-3). Originally, detailed mapping of the mouse PRL/PL locus [2, 4] had identified only a single Prl2c gene located between Prl2a1 and Prl4a1 within the PRL/PL cluster on chromosome 13. Only a single gene was identified in the rat PRL/PL cluster also . Indeed, a candidate Prl2c gene exists in this location in mice (ENSMUSG00000062551) and is currently predicted to have several alternative splice variants. Interestingly, to our knowledge, cDNAs corresponding to these predicted transcripts have yet to be described. Overall, it is very likely that the nomenclature will have to be revised as the existence of additional Prl2c genes located inside and/or outside of the PRL/PL locus is verified.
In the present study, a detailed temporal and spatial placental expression map was generated for all murine PRL/PL family members from E7.5 to E18.5 of gestation in three genetic strains. This detailed analysis uncovered several new markers for some trophoblast cell types that will be useful for future analysis of placental structure in mutant mice with placental phenotypes. Moreover, several important conclusions about regulation of the locus are apparent. First, no two family members have the same expression pattern even when complete temporal and spatial data are examined. Second, most genes are expressed in multiple trophoblast cell subtypes though none were detected in the chorion, where trophoblast stem cells reside, or in syncytiotrophoblast of the labyrinth layer. Third, bioinformatic comparisons of upstream regulatory regions identified predicted transcription factor binding site modules that are shared by genes expressed in the same trophoblast subtype. Fourth, further diversification of gene products from the PRL/PL locus occurs through alternative splice isoforms for several genes.
In reviewing the summary data, it was striking that so many genes within the PRL/PL family are expressed in the ectoplacental cone and in the adjacent parietal TGCs early in gestation. It was already reported that TGCs at the periphery of the ectoplacental cone express Prl3d and Prl2c as early as E6.5  and Prl7a1, Prl4a1 and Prl6a1 are expressed in the developing placenta as early as E8.0 [32, 54]. Interestingly, PRL/PL family members found at the periphery of the ectoplacental cone are not uniformly expressed in all TGCs and likely demarcate distinct TGC subpopulations and/or stages of TGC differentiation. Expression of genes in trophoblast cells at the center of the ectoplacental cone was also diverse. Of note, Prl3b1 is expressed in a small subset of cells within the center of the ectoplacental cone at E8.5, possibly in secondary TGC precursors or spongiotrophoblast precursors. Prl3b1 expression, which is broad later in gestation, has not been described before E9 at which time Prl3d expression in TGCs begins to decline . Prl5a1 expression is also interesting as it is biphasic in its expression, expressed in both TGCs and cells in the centre of the ectoplacental cone early in gestation and not again until late in gestation where it is expressed in spongiotrophoblast cells. Further studies are required to understand the heterogeneous ectoplacental cone and parietal TGC cell populations.
The current studies have also provided several markers that are restricted to either the spongiotrophoblast or glycogen cell populations. The junctional zone of the placenta contains both spongiotrophoblast cells and glycogen trophoblast cells. While many genes are known to be expressed within this layer , there had been very few genes definitively characterized as markers of either spongiotrophoblast or glycogen trophoblast cells, although members of the PRL/PL family (Prl2a1, Prl7b1 in mouse and Prl4a1, Prl2a1, Prl7b1 and Prl5a1 in rat) have been specifically localized to invasive/migratory trophoblast within the decidua , suggesting 'migratory' or glycogen trophoblast specificity. Pcdh12 [44, 45] and connexin 31  have been recently identified as glycogen trophoblast cell-specific markers, but no spongiotrophoblast-specific markers have been reported. Double in situ hybridization with PRL/PL family members and Pcdh12 showed that expression of Prl3b1, Prl2c, Prl8a6, Prl8a8, Prl8a1, Prl7a2, Prl3a1, Prl2b1, and Prl5a1 is restricted to spongiotrophoblast cells. Prl8a8 appears to be the best spongiotrophoblast-specific marker as it is not expressed in any other trophoblast cell subtypes throughout gestation and appears to be broadly expressed within the entire population of spongiotrophoblast. In contrast, Prl6a1, Prl2a1, Prl7b1 and Prl7c1 all have expression patterns overlapping with Pcdh12 expression (or complementary to Prl7a2 as shown) indicating they are specifically expressed in glycogen trophoblast cells within this layer. Markers that allow the distinction of glycogen trophoblast and spongiotrophoblast cells will be very useful in dissecting the pathology of mouse mutants with placental phenotypes, since the most commonly used marker, Tpbpa, is expressed in both . It is also unclear whether glycogen trophoblast cells differentiate directly from spongiotrophoblast later in gestation  or whether they represent an independent trophoblast population earlier within the ectoplacental cone . Examining both spongiotrophoblast and glycogen trophoblast in mutant mice with defects in the junctional zone will give insights into this question.
Gaining a better understanding of the regulation of gene expression from the PRL/PL locus was also a major aim of our study. Placental-specific expression from the expanded human growth hormone locus is regulated by a locus control region 15–32 kb upstream of the gene cluster [26, 27]. The evidence to date has not generally supported the notion that the rodent PRL/PL genes are similarly regulated; small defined upstream regions isolated from the promoters of several PRL/PL family members, including rat Prl3b1 (Pl2) [57–59], mouse Prl3d (Pl1) [60–62] and Prl2c (Plf) , rat Prl4a1 (Plp-A) , rat Prl8a2 (d/tPrp) , rat Prl8a3 (Plp-Cv) , independently drive trophoblast-specific expression in vitro. Furthermore, genes with similar placental expression patterns do not appear to be grouped together within the PRL/PL cluster [2, 4]. Nevertheless, regulatory elements for Prl3b1  and Pl3d and Prl2c (J.C. Cross, unpublished data) that are sufficient in vitro fail to drive trophoblast-specific expression when tested in vivo. This indicates a requirement for additional elements for these genes at least making it difficult to rule out completely the involvement of locus control regions or additional enhancers. In addition, complete temporal and spatial expression data for each PRL/PL family member have not been compiled. In the current study we compiled expression data for each family member over the whole time course of placentation with high resolution, reporting expression patterns in all the characterized trophoblast subtypes, in an effort to uncover unappreciated associations between locus position and expression patterns. The identification of regulatory elements driving trophoblast subtype-specific gene expression would be of particular use for future studies of trophoblast differentiation and placental development. It is now clear from our data set however that each PRL/PL family member has a truly unique expression pattern with no correlation to locus structure, consistent with previous reports [2, 4] and diminishing further the likelihood of control regions driving subtype-specific trophoblast expression. As such, subtype-specific expression patterns are likely driven by elements contained within the local upstream promoters of individual genes, although this does not preclude the possibility of a locus control region regulating placental-specific for the entire cluster, regulating trophoblast-specific transcriptional access to the whole of the region.
We therefore sought another way to investigate trophoblast subtype-specific regulatory elements. Previous studies of PRL/PL gene regulation have rarely investigated what, if any, subtype-specific expression is conveyed by the identified elements. Two notable exceptions are an enhancer element from the rat Prl8a3 promoter shown to drive expression preferentially in spongiotrophoblast cells rather than TGCs  and the demonstration that the transcription factor Gata2 is essential to restrict Prl4a1 expression to secondary TGCs within the TGC population . We used the bioinformatics software program Toucan2  to identify groups, or modules, of putative transcription factor binding sites present in multiple promoter sequences from genes co-expressed in a particular trophoblast subtype, rather than a single promoter in isolation. This approach effectively narrows the focus to elements involved in gene expression within a particular cell population, rather than trophoblast specificity in general. Our comprehensive expression data set allowed us for the first time to try such an in silico approach and we compared the promoters of genes co-expressed in the poorly characterized glycogen trophoblast and sinusoidal TGC populations as examples, identifying several modules of putative transcription factor binding sites common to the promoters of each group. The identification of these conserved modules serves not only to bolster the notion of local versus distant regulation of PRL/PL family members, but provides a valuable in silico resource to identify candidate elements for further experimental studies. Interestingly, putative Gata3 sites were identified in all the modules, a factor of known importance for trophoblast-specific expression of Prl3d and Prl2c [60–62]. Also, putative AP-1 sites were present in both modules contained in the promoters of genes co-expressed in glycogen trophoblast cells, motifs important for Plr3d and Plr3b1 expression [59, 62]. The presence of motifs previously been shown to play roles in regulating trophoblast-specific PRL/PL members within the modules imparts a higher degree of confidence to these predicted elements, making them strong candidates for further experimental studies.
We conducted our expression analysis in three different mouse lines, not only to increase the confidence of our data set but also to investigate whether any PRL/PL family members are expressed differently between commonly used strains. We chose the outbred stock CD-1 and two inbred strains C57/B6 and 129svj, all commonly used lines. Average litter sizes are known to vary among different mouse stocks and strains (129svj – average 4.5 pups/litter , C57/B6 – average 6.2 pups/litter , CD-1 – average 11 pups/litter (Charles River) and several PRL/PL family members have been shown to regulate reproductive adaptations to physiological stresses such as hypoxia. Differences in PRL/PL gene expression between lines may therefore be related to differences in litter size and the accompanying changes in physiological adaptation . Interestingly, only a few slight differences in the timing of PRL/PL family expression or the breadth of expression within a certain trophoblast subtype were observed.
Gene duplication followed by the acquisition of novel gene function offers a way for species to adapt to changing environmental challenges or to capitalize on newly available niches. Interestingly, members of the murine PRL/PL family have undergone further diversification by adopting splice variants. Evidence for positive selection within large families of amplified genes, particularly those associated with reproduction, has been accumulating [70–74]. One theory suggests that the gene duplication event itself is positively selected for to allow the amplification of genes that are somewhat pre-adapted to meet a particular environmental challenge or biochemical niche, so that divergence and acquisition of new functionality may follow . It is tempting to visualize the evolution of the PRL/PL genes in rodents and ruminants as a result of the driving environmental challenge of reproductive fitness. Numerous other gene families have been reported in the mouse genome that are also associated with reproduction such as the placentally expressed cathepsins [76–78], Rhox transcription factors  and pregnancy-specific glycoproteins [80, 81], although their specific roles in reproduction remain largely unknown. The functions of the individual PRL/PL family members are just beginning to be revealed through knockout mouse studies. The diverse patterns of expression and evidence of splice variants indicates that the family is rapidly evolving and suggests that the different genes have distinct functions. The majority of PRL/PL genes are expressed later in gestation when it is likely they are acting as hormones to affect feto-maternal adaptations to pregnancy, but it is also apparent from this study that approximately half of the PRL/PL family members are expressed early in the ectoplacental cone and may be involved in decisions affecting cell fate. Whether the PRL/PL locus evolved as a result of positive selection, or some other adaptive force, it is now clear that PRL/PL gene amplification serves as an excellent model for studying the process of genetic diversification.
The gene expression data in this study clearly demonstrates that no two PRL/PL family members share the same temporal and spatial expression pattern. It is now very clear that there is no correlation in expression between genes that are most closely related or between adjacent genes in the PRL/PL locus. Bioinformatic analysis of upstream regulatory regions identified conserved modules of putative transcription factor binding sites shared by genes expressed in the same trophoblast subtype. Interestingly, we have also observed that although mouse PRL/PL genes are expressed in multiple trophoblast subtypes, no family members were detected in the chorion, where trophoblast stem cells reside, or in syncytiotrophoblast of the labyrinth layer. The information gleaned in this study has also identified novel markers that will provide valuable insight into mouse models with placental phenotypes. Additionally, we have observed for the first time that approximately half of the PRL/PL genes are expressed early in the ectoplacental cone and may be involved in decisions affecting cell fate. Based on our findings, we propose that the PRL/PL gene family represents an excellent model for studying the process of genetic diversification.
The work was supported by grants from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). DGS was supported by fellowships from the Lalor Foundation and the AHFMR. SR was supported by a studentship from the AHFMR and JCC is an AHFMR Scientist.
- Forsyth IA, Wallis M: Growth hormone and prolactin – molecular and functional evolution. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2002, 7 (3): 291-312.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mallon AM, Wilming L, Weekes J, Gilbert JG, Ashurst J, Peyrefitte S, Matthews L, Cadman M, McKeone R, Sellick CA, Arkell R, Botcherby MR, Strivens MA, Campbell RD, Gregory S, Denny P, Hancock JM, Rogers J, Brown SD: Organization and evolution of a gene-rich region of the mouse genome: a 12.7-Mb region deleted in the Del(13)Svea36H mouse. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (10A): 1888-1901.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soares MJ: The prolactin and growth hormone families: pregnancy-specific hormones/cytokines at the maternal-fetal interface. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004, 2: 51-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiemers DO, Shao LJ, Ain R, Dai G, Soares MJ: The mouse prolactin gene family locus. Endocrinology. 2003, 144 (1): 313-325.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alam SM, Ain R, Konna T, Ho-Chen J, Soares MJ: The rat prolactin gene family locus: species-specific gene family expansion. Mamm Genome. 2006Google Scholar
- Soares MJ: The prolactin family and pregnancy-dependent adaptations. Animal Sci J. 2006, 77 (1): 1-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi T: Biology of the PRL family in bovine placenta. I. Bovine placental lactogen: expression, structure and proposed roles. Animal Sci J. 2006, 77: 10-17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ushizawa K, Hashizume K: Biology of the PRL family in bovine placenta. II. Bovine prolactin-related proteins: their expression, structure and proposed roles. Animal Sci J. 2006, 77 (18–27):Google Scholar
- Stricker P, Grueter R: Action du lobe anterieur de l'hypophyse sur la montee laiteuse. CR Soc Biol. 1928, 99: 1978-1980.Google Scholar
- Bao L, Tessier C, Prigent-Tessier A, Li F, Buzzio OL, Callegari EA, Horseman ND, Gibori G: Decidual Prolactin Silences the Expression of Genes Detrimental to Pregnancy. Endocrinology. 2007Google Scholar
- Goffin V, Binart N, Touraine P, Kelly PA: Prolactin: the new biology of an old hormone. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002, 64: 47-67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bole-Feysot C, Goffin V, Edery M, Binart N, Kelly PA: Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocr Rev. 1998, 19 (3): 225-268.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soares MJ, Alam SM, Duckworth ML, Horseman ND, Konno T, Linzer DI, Maltais LJ, Nilsen-Hamilton M, Shiota K, Smith JR, Wallis M: A standardized nomenclature for the mouse and rat prolactin superfamilies. Mamm Genome. 2007, 18 (3): 154-156.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelly PA, Tsushima T, Shiu RP, Friesen HG: Lactogenic and growth hormone-like activities in pregnancy determined by radioreceptor assays. Endocrinology. 1976, 99 (3): 765-774.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forsyth IA: Comparative aspects of placental lactogens: structure and function. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 1994, 102 (3): 244-251.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mann PE, Bridges RS: Lactogenic hormone regulation of maternal behavior. Prog Brain Res. 2001, 133: 251-262.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sorenson RL, Brelje TC: Adaptation of islets of Langerhans to pregnancy: beta-cell growth, enhanced insulin secretion and the role of lactogenic hormones. Horm Metab Res. 1997, 29 (6): 301-307.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Linzer DI, Nathans D: Nucleotide sequence of a growth-related mRNA encoding a member of the prolactin-growth hormone family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81 (14): 4255-4259.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Linzer DI, Nathans D: A new member of the prolactin-growth hormone gene family expressed in mouse placenta. Embo J. 1985, 4 (6): 1419-1423.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jackson D, Volpert OV, Bouck N, Linzer DI: Stimulation and inhibition of angiogenesis by placental proliferin and proliferin-related protein. Science. 1994, 266 (5190): 1581-1584.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharyya S, Lin J, Linzer DI: Reactivation of a hematopoietic endocrine program of pregnancy contributes to recovery from thrombocytopenia. Mol Endocrinol. 2002, 16 (6): 1386-1393.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou B, Kong X, Linzer DI: Enhanced recovery from thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in mice constitutively expressing a placental hematopoietic cytokine. Endocrinology. 2005, 146 (1): 64-70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muller H, Liu B, Croy BA, Head JR, Hunt JS, Dai G, Soares MJ: Uterine natural killer cells are targets for a trophoblast cell-specific cytokine, prolactin-like protein A. Endocrinology. 1999, 140 (6): 2711-2720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ain R, Dai G, Dunmore JH, Godwin AR, Soares MJ: A prolactin family paralog regulates reproductive adaptations to a physiological stressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (47): 16543-16548.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alam SM, Konno T, Dai G, Lu L, Wang D, Dunmore JH, Godwin AR, Soares MJ: A uterine decidual cell cytokine ensures pregnancy-dependent adaptations to a physiological stressor. Development. 2007, 134 (2): 407-415.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su Y, Liebhaber SA, Cooke NE: The human growth hormone gene cluster locus control region supports position-independent pituitary- and placenta-specific expression in the transgenic mouse. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (11): 7902-7909.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones BK, Monks BR, Liebhaber SA, Cooke NE: The human growth hormone gene is regulated by a multicomponent locus control region. Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 15 (12): 7010-7021.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orwig KE, Ishimura R, Muller H, Liu B, Soares MJ: Identification and characterization of a mouse homolog for decidual/trophoblast prolactin-related protein. Endocrinology. 1997, 138 (12): 5511-5517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ain R, Trinh ML, Soares MJ: Interleukin-11 signaling is required for the differentiation of natural killer cells at the maternal-fetal interface. Dev Dyn. 2004, 231 (4): 700-708.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dai G, Chapman BM, Liu B, Orwig KE, Wang D, White RA, Preuett B, Soares MJ: A new member of the mouse prolactin (PRL)-like protein-C subfamily, PRL-like protein-C alpha: structure and expression. Endocrinology. 1998, 139 (12): 5157-5163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dai G, Wang D, Liu B, Kasik JW, Muller H, White RA, Hummel GS, Soares MJ: Three novel paralogs of the rodent prolactin gene family. J Endocrinol. 2000, 166 (1): 63-75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin J, Poole J, Linzer DI: Two novel members of the prolactin/growth hormone family are expressed in the mouse placenta. Endocrinology. 1997, 138 (12): 5535-5540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muller H, Ishimura R, Orwig KE, Liu B, Soares MJ: Homologues for prolactin-like proteins A and B are present in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 1998, 58 (1): 45-51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muller H, Orwig KE, Soares MJ: Identification of two new members of the mouse prolactin gene family. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998, 1396 (3): 251-258.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simmons DG, Fortier AL, Cross JC: Diverse subtypes and developmental origins of trophoblast giant cells in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol. 2007Google Scholar
- Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M: MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004, 5 (2): 150-163.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aerts S, Van Loo P, Thijs G, Mayer H, de Martin R, Moreau Y, De Moor B: TOUCAN 2: the all-inclusive open source workbench for regulatory sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, W393-396. 33 Web ServerGoogle Scholar
- Church GM, Gilbert W: Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81 (7): 1991-1995.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fang Y, Lepont P, Fassett JT, Ford SP, Mubaidin A, Hamilton RT, Nilsen-Hamilton M: Signaling between the placenta and the uterus involving the mitogen-regulated protein/proliferins. Endocrinology. 1999, 140 (11): 5239-5249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fassett JT, Hamilton RT, Nilsen-Hamilton M: Mrp4, a new mitogen-regulated protein/proliferin gene; unique in this gene family for its expression in the adult mouse tail and ear. Endocrinology. 2000, 141 (5): 1863-1871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fassett JT, Nilsen-Hamilton M: Mrp3, a mitogen-regulated protein/proliferin gene expressed in wound healing and in hair follicles. Endocrinology. 2001, 142 (5): 2129-2137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simmons DG, Cross JC: Determinants of trophoblast lineage and cell subtype specification in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol. 2005, 284 (1): 12-24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watson ED, Cross JC: Development of structures and transport functions in the mouse placenta. Physiology (Bethesda). 2005, 20: 180-193.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bouillot S, Rampon C, Tillet E, Huber P: Tracing the glycogen cells with protocadherin 12 during mouse placenta development. Placenta. 2006, 27 (8): 882-888.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rampon C, Prandini MH, Bouillot S, Pointu H, Tillet E, Frank R, Vernet M, Huber P: Protocadherin 12 (VE-cadherin 2) is expressed in endothelial, trophoblast, and mesangial cells. Exp Cell Res. 2005, 302 (1): 48-60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adamson SL, Lu Y, Whiteley KJ, Holmyard D, Hemberger M, Pfarrer C, Cross JC: Interactions between trophoblast cells and the maternal and fetal circulation in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol. 2002, 250 (2): 358-373.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hubbard T, Andrews D, Caccamo M, Cameron G, Chen Y, Clamp M, Clarke L, Coates G, Cox T, Cunningham F: Ensembl 2005. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, D447-453. 33 DatabaseGoogle Scholar
- Ashurst JL, Chen CK, Gilbert JG, Jekosch K, Keenan S, Meidl P, Searle SM, Stalker J, Storey R, Trevanion S, Wilming L, Hubbard T: The Vertebrate Genome Annotation (Vega) database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, D459-465. 33 DatabaseGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215 (3): 403-410.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quackenbush J, Cho J, Lee D, Liang F, Holt I, Karamycheva S, Parvizi B, Pertea G, Sultana R, White J: The TIGR Gene Indices: analysis of gene transcript sequences in highly sampled eukaryotic species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (1): 159-164.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson-Grusby LL, Pravtcheva D, Ruddle FH, Linzer DI: Chromosomal mapping of the prolactin/growth hormone gene family in the mouse. Endocrinology. 1988, 122 (6): 2462-2466.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilder EL, Linzer DI: Expression of multiple proliferin genes in mouse cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1986, 6 (9): 3283-3286.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carney EW, Prideaux V, Lye SJ, Rossant J: Progressive expression of trophoblast-specific genes during formation of mouse trophoblast giant cells in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 1993, 34 (4): 357-368.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin J, Poole J, Linzer DI: Three new members of the mouse prolactin/growth hormone family are homologous to proteins expressed in the rat. Endocrinology. 1997, 138 (12): 5541-5549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ain R, Canham LN, Soares MJ: Gestation stage-dependent intrauterine trophoblast cell invasion in the rat and mouse: novel endocrine phenotype and regulation. Dev Biol. 2003, 260 (1): 176-190.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coan PM, Conroy N, Burton GJ, Ferguson-Smith AC: Origin and characteristics of glycogen cells in the developing murine placenta. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235 (12): 3280-3294.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozturk A, Donald LJ, Li L, Duckworth HW, Duckworth ML: Proteomic identification of AP2 gamma as a rat placental lactogen II trophoblast cell-specific enhancer binding protein. Endocrinology. 2006, 147 (9): 4319-4329.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shah P, Sun Y, Szpirer C, Duckworth ML: Rat placental lactogen II gene: characterization of gene structure and placental-specific expression. Endocrinology. 1998, 139 (3): 967-973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun Y, Duckworth ML: Identification of a placental-specific enhancer in the rat placental lactogen II gene that contains binding sites for members of the Ets and AP-1 (activator protein 1) families of transcription factors. Mol Endocrinol. 1999, 13 (3): 385-399.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma GT, Roth ME, Groskopf JC, Tsai FY, Orkin SH, Grosveld F, Engel JD, Linzer DI: GATA-2 and GATA-3 regulate trophoblast-specific gene expression in vivo. Development. 1997, 124 (4): 907-914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ng YK, George KM, Engel JD, Linzer DI: GATA factor activity is required for the trophoblast-specific transcriptional regulation of the mouse placental lactogen I gene. Development. 1994, 120 (11): 3257-3266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shida MM, Ng YK, Soares MJ, Linzer DI: Trophoblast-specific transcription from the mouse placental lactogen-I gene promoter. Mol Endocrinol. 1993, 7 (2): 181-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vuille JC, Cattini PA, Bock ME, Verstuyf A, Schroedter IC, Duckworth ML, Friesen HG: Rat prolactin-like protein A partial gene and promoter structure: promoter activity in placental and pituitary cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1993, 96 (1–2): 91-98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orwig KE, Soares MJ: Transcriptional activation of the decidual/trophoblast prolactin-related protein gene. Endocrinology. 1999, 140 (9): 4032-4039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dai G, Wolfe MW, Soares MJ: Distinct regulatory regions from the prolactin-like protein C variant promoter direct trophoblast giant cell versus spongiotrophoblast cell-specific expression. Endocrinology. 1999, 140 (10): 4691-4698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ozturk A, Fresnoza A, Savoie A, Duckworth HW, Duckworth ML: Defining regulatory regions in the rat prolactin gene family locus using a large P1 genomic clone. Endocrinology. 2003, 144 (11): 4742-4754.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma GT, Linzer DI: GATA-2 restricts prolactin-like protein A expression to secondary trophoblast giant cells in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 2000, 63 (2): 570-574.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Festing MF, Blackmore DK: Life span of specified-pathogen-free (MRC category 4) mice and rats. Lab Anim. 1971, 5 (2): 179-192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soares MJ, Konno T, Alam SM: The prolactin family: effectors of pregnancy-dependent adaptations. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 18 (3): 114-121.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wallis OC, Mac-Kwashie AO, Makri G, Wallis M: Molecular evolution of prolactin in primates. J Mol Evol. 2005, 60 (5): 606-614.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wallis M: Remarkably high rate of molecular evolution of ruminant placental lactogens. J Mol Evol. 1993, 37 (1): 86-88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hughes AL, Green JA, Garbayo JM, Roberts RM: Adaptive diversification within a large family of recently duplicated, placentally expressed genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (7): 3319-3323.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chakrabarty A, MacLean JA, Hughes AL, Roberts RM, Green JA: Rapid evolution of the trophoblast kunitz domain proteins (TKDPs)-a multigene family in ruminant ungulates. J Mol Evol. 2006, 63 (2): 274-282.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Huang JF, Zhang YP: Adaptive evolution of the first extra exon in the murid rodent prolactin gene family. Biochem Genet. 2007, 45: 397-408.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Francino MP: An adaptive radiation model for the origin of new gene functions. Nat Genet. 2005, 37 (6): 573-577.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mason RW, Stabley DL, Picerno GN, Frenck J, Xing S, Bertenshaw GP, Sol-Church K: Evolution of placental proteases. Biol Chem. 2002, 383 (7–8): 1113-1118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sol-Church K, Picerno GN, Stabley DL, Frenck J, Xing S, Bertenshaw GP, Mason RW: Evolution of placentally expressed cathepsins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 293 (1): 23-29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deussing J, Kouadio M, Rehman S, Werber I, Schwinde A, Peters C: Identification and characterization of a dense cluster of placenta-specific cysteine peptidase genes and related genes on mouse chromosome 13. Genomics. 2002, 79 (2): 225-240.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maclean JA, Chen MA, Wayne CM, Bruce SR, Rao M, Meistrich ML, Macleod C, Wilkinson MF: Rhox: a new homeobox gene cluster. Cell. 2005, 120 (3): 369-382.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McLellan AS, Fischer B, Dveksler G, Hori T, Wynne F, Ball M, Okumura K, Moore T, Zimmermann W: Structure and evolution of the mouse pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (Psg) gene locus. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6 (1): 4-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McLellan AS, Zimmermann W, Moore T: Conservation of pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (PSG) N domains following independent expansions of the gene families in rodents and primates. BMC Evol Biol. 2005, 5: 39-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.