Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the fractions that were identified as repetitive by manual annotation and through MDR analysis.

From: Low-pass shotgun sequencing of the barley genome facilitates rapid identification of genes, conserved non-coding sequences and novel repeats

Sequence

Exp1

MDR2

OL3

New4

Total5

AF474373

56.8

48.1

40.9

7.1

63.9

AF521177

37.4

23.3

18.5

4.8

42.2

AY268139

71.7

58.6

55.6

3.0

74.7

AY485643

44.4

38.2

30.8

7.4

51.8

AY642926

48.1

38.0

32.9

5.1

53.2

AY643842S2

71.7

50.5

48.6

1.9

73.6

AY643842S3

79.9

69.3

68.0

1.3

81.2

AY661558

87.6

62.1

59.6

2.5

90.1

EF067844

81.5

57.7

56.0

1.7

83.2

Average

64.3

49.5

45.6

3.9

68.2

  1. All figures are in % of the total length of the sequence analysed.
  2. 1Repetitive fraction identified by expert annotation.
  3. 2Repetitive fraction identified by MDR analysis.
  4. 3Overlap, fraction covered by both.
  5. 4Fraction identified as repetitive exclusively through MDR.
  6. 5Expert annotation and MDR analysis combined