Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Comparison of the fractions that were identified as repetitive by manual annotation and through MDR analysis.

From: Low-pass shotgun sequencing of the barley genome facilitates rapid identification of genes, conserved non-coding sequences and novel repeats

Sequence Exp1 MDR2 OL3 New4 Total5
AF474373 56.8 48.1 40.9 7.1 63.9
AF521177 37.4 23.3 18.5 4.8 42.2
AY268139 71.7 58.6 55.6 3.0 74.7
AY485643 44.4 38.2 30.8 7.4 51.8
AY642926 48.1 38.0 32.9 5.1 53.2
AY643842S2 71.7 50.5 48.6 1.9 73.6
AY643842S3 79.9 69.3 68.0 1.3 81.2
AY661558 87.6 62.1 59.6 2.5 90.1
EF067844 81.5 57.7 56.0 1.7 83.2
Average 64.3 49.5 45.6 3.9 68.2
  1. All figures are in % of the total length of the sequence analysed.
  2. 1Repetitive fraction identified by expert annotation.
  3. 2Repetitive fraction identified by MDR analysis.
  4. 3Overlap, fraction covered by both.
  5. 4Fraction identified as repetitive exclusively through MDR.
  6. 5Expert annotation and MDR analysis combined