Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Comparison of fractions of de novo sequenced BACs that were identified as repetitive by repeat masking and MDR analysis.

From: Low-pass shotgun sequencing of the barley genome facilitates rapid identification of genes, conserved non-coding sequences and novel repeats

BAC size BLASTN1 BLASTX2 combined3 MDR4 combined5 New6
773C20 91561 67.5 32.6 71.4 52.3 74.4 3
333E11 96473 57.0 23.0 59.5 47.8 65.9 6.5
567E19 98005 69.3 25.8 71.2 60.1 76.5 5.3
89E23 104909 26.8 9.7 30.1 25.5 38.1 8
789F12 97547 73.9 36.7 79.7 57.2 81.7 2.1
318G23 93787 67.3 20.1 70.6 53.1 77.1 6.5
104J20 112610 72.9 33.8 77.4 55.5 80.5 3.2
297P14 78796 70.9 24.6 71.0 57.6 73.6 2.6
Total 773688 62.8 25.8 66.1 50.8 70.7 4.7
  1. All figures are in % of the total length of the sequence analysed.
  2. 1Fraction masked based on BLASTN search against TREP
  3. 2Fraction masked based on BLASTX search against PTREP
  4. 3Fraction masked when information form BLASTN and BLSTX is combined
  5. 4Repetitive fraction identified by MDR analysis
  6. 5Fraction masked when information form BLAST and MDR is combined
  7. 6Fraction identified as repetitive exclusively through MDR