Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of fractions of de novo sequenced BACs that were identified as repetitive by repeat masking and MDR analysis.

From: Low-pass shotgun sequencing of the barley genome facilitates rapid identification of genes, conserved non-coding sequences and novel repeats

BAC

size

BLASTN1

BLASTX2

combined3

MDR4

combined5

New6

773C20

91561

67.5

32.6

71.4

52.3

74.4

3

333E11

96473

57.0

23.0

59.5

47.8

65.9

6.5

567E19

98005

69.3

25.8

71.2

60.1

76.5

5.3

89E23

104909

26.8

9.7

30.1

25.5

38.1

8

789F12

97547

73.9

36.7

79.7

57.2

81.7

2.1

318G23

93787

67.3

20.1

70.6

53.1

77.1

6.5

104J20

112610

72.9

33.8

77.4

55.5

80.5

3.2

297P14

78796

70.9

24.6

71.0

57.6

73.6

2.6

Total

773688

62.8

25.8

66.1

50.8

70.7

4.7

  1. All figures are in % of the total length of the sequence analysed.
  2. 1Fraction masked based on BLASTN search against TREP
  3. 2Fraction masked based on BLASTX search against PTREP
  4. 3Fraction masked when information form BLASTN and BLSTX is combined
  5. 4Repetitive fraction identified by MDR analysis
  6. 5Fraction masked when information form BLAST and MDR is combined
  7. 6Fraction identified as repetitive exclusively through MDR