Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the six algorithms, using the microarray hybridization data from the EDL933 sequenced strain. The result of using each algorithm were compared to BLASTN data and are shown below.

From: A process for analysis of microarray comparative genomics hybridisation studies for bacterial genomes

 

Cut-off

TP

FP

TN

FN

Sensitivity

Specificity

M-Score

 

0.50

5202

24

475

43

99.18

95.19

98.83

Naïve

0.33

5211

31

468

34

99.35

93.79

98.87

cut-off

0.25

5218

37

462

27

99.49

92.59

98.89

 

0.20

5222

43

456

23

99.56

91.38

98.58

 

0.10

5235

127

372

10

99.81

74.55

97.61

GENCOM*

 

5167

21

478

78

98.31

95.79

98.09

GACK**

EPP = 50

5083

22

477

162

96.91

95.59

96.80

 

EPP= 0

5197

24

475

48

99.08

95.19

98.75

Prowollik

 

5185

23

476

57

98.91

95.39

98.60

MKD***

 

5207

29

470

38

99.28

94.18

98.84

Mixture

Bimodal

5215

37

462

30

99.42

92.59

98.83

 

Trimodal

5207

27

472

38

99.27

94.59

98.86

  1. The number of genes estimated as correctly conserved (True positives, TP), genes identified as conserved but actually are variable (false positives, FP), genes identified as correctly variable (true negatives TN), and genes identified falsely as variable (false negative FN), are given. The sensitivity, specificity, and M-Score are also calculated, where the sensitivity = TP/(TP+FP), specificity = TN/(FP+TN), and M-Score = Sensitivity*prevalence + Specificity*(1-prevalence)
  2. * Institute of Food Research method (GENCOM)
  3. ** Genotyping Analysis by Charlie Kim method (GACK)
  4. *** Minimum Kernel Density method (MKD)