Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the six algorithms, using the microarray hybridization data from the Sakai sequenced strain. The result of using each algorithm were compared to BLASTN data and are shown below.

From: A process for analysis of microarray comparative genomics hybridisation studies for bacterial genomes

 

Cut-off

TP

FP

TN

FN

Sensitivity

Specificity

M-Score

 

0.50

5285

2

416

41

99.23

99.52

99.25

Naïve

0.33

5297

6

412

29

99.45

98.56

99.39

cut-off

0.25

5302

8

410

24

99.55

98.09

99.44

 

0.20

5308

12

406

18

99.66

97.13

99.48

 

0.10

5316

64

354

10

99.81

84.69

98.71

GENCOM*

 

5238

2

416

88

98.34

99.52

98.43

GACK**

EPP = 50

5137

1

417

189

96.45

99.76

96.69

 

EPP= 0

5261

1

417

65

98.78

99.76

98.85

Prowollik

 

5277

1

417

49

99.07

98.76

99.13

MKD***

 

5297

6

412

29

99.45

98.56

99.39

Mixture

Bimodal

5296

8

413

30

99.44

98.80

99.39

 

Trimodal

5244

1

417

82

98.46

99.76

98.55

  1. The number of genes estimated as correctly conserved (True positives, TP), genes identified as conserved but actually are variable (false positives, FP), genes identified as correctly variable (true negatives TN), and genes identified falsely as variable (false negative FN), are given. The sensitivity, specificity, and M-Score are also calculated, where the sensitivity = TP/(TP+FP), specificity = TN/(FP+TN), and M-Score = Sensitivity*prevalence + Specificity*(1-prevalence)
  2. * Institute of Food Research method (GENCOM)
  3. ** Genotyping Analysis by Charlie Kim method (GACK)
  4. *** Minimum Kernel Density method (MKD)