Skip to main content

Table 2 Accuracy of REANNOTATE's inferences relative to manual annotation

From: Automated paleontology of repetitive DNA with REANNOTATE

  Defragmentation Nesting Time
  Sensitivity Specificity   
maize (AF123535.1) 97.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
wheat (AF459639.1) 96.0% 100.0% 93.3% 90.9%
  1. Accuracy of predictions in the Defragmentation layer of re-annotation is given by their sensitivity and specificity according to the formulas T P T P + F N MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaqcfa4aaSaaaeaacqWGubavcqWGqbauaeaacqWGubavcqWGqbaucqGHRaWkcqWGgbGrcqWGobGtaaaaaa@3443@ and T N T N + F P MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaqcfa4aaSaaaeaacqWGubavcqWGobGtaeaacqWGubavcqWGobGtcqGHRaWkcqWGgbGrcqWGqbauaaaaaa@343F@ respectively, where TP is the count of true positives, TN true negatives, FP false positives, and FN the count of false negatives (see Implementation) relative to the manual annotations. Here a 'prediction' refers to a sequence similarity hit reported by REPEAT MASKER that has been defragmented into a TE model by REANNOTATE. For the Nesting Structure and Time layers accuracy is given as the proportion of predictions in agreement with the original manual annotation [45, 51].