Skip to main content

Table 2 The performance of the algorithm for different classification studies

From: A stable iterative method for refining discriminative gene clusters

Datasets

θ test

ρ S (i) based on d ¯ ( A i , Δ 2 ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafmizaqMbaebacqGGOaakcqWGbbqqdaWgaaWcbaGaemyAaKgabeaakiabcYcaSiqbfs5aezaafaWaaSbaaSqaaiabikdaYaqabaGccqGGPaqkaaa@3506@

ρ all (i) based on δ ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafqiTdqMbaKaaaaa@2D8A@ (A i )

ω ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafqyYdCNbaebaaaa@2DBA@ (A i )

Leukemia ALL T/B cell

0.970

0.977

1.72E-02

8.28E-03

0.088

0.331

0.406

0.973

Breast

0.843

0.842

1.33E-02

8.36E-03

0.142

0.421

0.351

0.974

Carcinoma

0.983

0.981

2.96E-02

3.20E-02

0.194

0.252

0.382

0.966

Colon

0.814

0.806

2.43E-02

2.06E-02

0.750

0.755

0.673

0.978

DLBCL

0.896

0.929

8.75E-02

1.99E-02

0.441

0.514

0.716

0.982

Melanoma

0.913

0.921

1.71E-02

2.25E-02

0.129

0.463

0.272

0.957

Prostate

0.889

0.916

4.79E-02

2.27E-02

0.495

0.541

0.680

0.987

SRBCT-BL

1.000

1.000

3.63E-04

7.52E-05

0.314

0.322

0.682

0.984

SRBCT-EWS

0.956

0.986

5.06E-04

9.17E-05

0.297

0.408

0.634

0.984

SRBCT-NB

0.989

0.996

2.99E-04

6.42E-05

0.321

0.436

0.665

0.986

SRBCT-RMS

0.974

0.980

4.82E-04

8.18E-05

0.304

0.347

0.630

0.989

Lukemia AML/ALL

0.966

0.972

5.62E-03

2.38E-03

0.212

0.398

0.627

0.980