Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of SWER, MEC and runtimes for SDhaP and CPLEX on simulated diploid data with 1% error rate

From: SDhaP: haplotype assembly for diploids and polyploids via semi-definite programming

Data

Simulated data

 

SDhaP

CPLEX(optimal)

CPLEX(heuristic)

 

MEC

SWER

time

MEC

SWER

time

MEC

SWER

time

l 103, c 10

100

0.001

1

100

0.001

192

100

0.001

57

l 103, c 20

215

0.001

4

215

0.001

1320

215

0.001

373

l 103, c 30

291

0.001

6

291

0.001

1241

291

0.001

910

l 104, c 10

978

0.008

14

-

-

-

972

0.008

4505

l 104, c 20

2039

0.004

33

-

-

-

2039

0.004

89811

l 104, c 30

2988

0.004

68

-

-

-

-

-

-

l 105, c 10

10356

0.008

324

-

-

-

-

-

-

l 105, c 20

19975

0.007

713

-

-

-

-

-

-

l 105, c 30

29967

0.005

1810

-

-

-

-

-

-

  1. MEC, SWER and running times (in seconds) for SDhaP, RefHap, HAPCUT and HapTree algorithms for simulated data of different lengths (l) and with different coverages (c). The data contains a fixed 1% fraction of genotyping errors. SDhaP is more accurate in terms of MEC and SWER and faster by almost an order of magnitude compared to other schemes for longer blocks.