Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of SWER, MEC and runtimes for different schemes on simulated biallelic triploid data

From: SDhaP: haplotype assembly for diploids and polyploids via semi-definite programming

Dataset parameters Genotyping error rate SDhaP HapTree
   MEC SWER t(in secs) MEC SWER t(in secs)
length 103, cov 15 0.0348 170 0.0130 18 401 0.0430 1860
length 103, cov 30 0.0135 331 0.0027 90 582 0.0220 8
length 103, cov 45 0.0064 488 0.0013 183 614 0.0053 5
length 104, cov 15 0.0348 1848 0.0143 388 - - -
length 104, cov 30 0.0135 4091 0.0038 1289 4744 0.0191 680
length 104, cov 45 0.0064 6169 0.0025 2048 5492 0.0060 2424
  1. MEC, SWER and running times for SDhaP and HapTree algorithms on biallelic triploid simulated data. For l = 104 and c = 15, HapTree did not complete the task in 48 hrs.