Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of SWER, MEC and runtimes for different schemes on simulated biallelic tetraploid data

From: SDhaP: haplotype assembly for diploids and polyploids via semi-definite programming

Dataset parameters

genotyping error rate

SDhaP

HapTree

  

MEC

SWER

t(in secs)

MEC

SWER

t(in secs)

length 103, cov 20

0.0487

193

0.0105

40

626

0.0891

580

length 103, cov 40

0.0217

385

0.0050

124

974

0.0380

780

length 103, cov 80

0.0081

836

0.0015

560

2174

0.0290

15

length 104, cov 20

0.0487

4676

0.0233

383

-

-

-

length 104, cov 40

0.0217

6966

0.0096

2901

-

-

-

length 104, cov 80

0.0081

14146

0.0072

8784

-

-

-

  1. MEC, SWER and running times for SDhaP and HapTree algorithms on biallelic tetraploid simulated data. For l = 104, HapTree did not complete the task in 48 hrs.