Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of SWER, MEC and runtimes for different schemes on simulated biallelic tetraploid data

From: SDhaP: haplotype assembly for diploids and polyploids via semi-definite programming

Dataset parameters genotyping error rate SDhaP HapTree
   MEC SWER t(in secs) MEC SWER t(in secs)
length 103, cov 20 0.0487 193 0.0105 40 626 0.0891 580
length 103, cov 40 0.0217 385 0.0050 124 974 0.0380 780
length 103, cov 80 0.0081 836 0.0015 560 2174 0.0290 15
length 104, cov 20 0.0487 4676 0.0233 383 - - -
length 104, cov 40 0.0217 6966 0.0096 2901 - - -
length 104, cov 80 0.0081 14146 0.0072 8784 - - -
  1. MEC, SWER and running times for SDhaP and HapTree algorithms on biallelic tetraploid simulated data. For l = 104, HapTree did not complete the task in 48 hrs.