Table 1 Statistics for read filtering and mapping
From: Transcriptional events co-regulated by hypoxia and cold stresses in Zebrafish larvae
Sample name | Control1 | Control2 | Control3 | Hypoxia | Hypoxia | Hypoxia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total reads (M) | 19.80x2 | 24.72x2 | 19.48x2 | 30.53x2 | 26.85x2 | 28.45x2 |
Good reads (M) | 38.05 | 47.76 | 37.62 | 58.76 | 51.94 | 54.91 |
% Good reads | 96.09 | 96.61 | 96.58 | 96.24 | 96.72 | 96.52 |
Processed reads (M) | 37.52 | 47.22 | 37.18 | 57.94 | 51.36 | 54.44 |
Mapped reads (M) | 34.46 | 42.89 | 33.99 | 53.08 | 47.28 | 50.00 |
% Mapped (M) | 91.84 | 90.83 | 91.42 | 91.61 | 92.06 | 91.84 |
Total alignment (M) | 43.68 | 53.52 | 43.79 | 68.4 | 58.95 | 62.26 |
Total potential splices (M) | 5.22 | 5.25 | 5.22 | 5.26 | 5.24 | 5.24 |
% Reads mapped to junction | 15.15 | 12.24 | 15.36 | 9.91 | 11.08 | 10.48 |
Unique mapping (M) | 33.35 | 41.72 | 33.54 | 51.65 | 45.49 | 48.24 |
% Unique mapping | 76.35 | 77.95 | 76.59 | 75.51 | 77.17 | 77.48 |