Table 2 Numbers of different cis-NATs for the different topology types for the four other data sets *
From: The distribution and evolution of Arabidopsis thaliana cis natural antisense transcripts
Type of cis-NAT ( as in Figure 1 ) | Matsui2008 | Okamoto2010 | RNASeq | RepTAS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total number for the topology type | Number that have significant conservation (P < 0.05) | Total number for the topology type | Number that have significant conservation (P < 0.05) | Total number for the topology type | Number that have significant conservation (P < 0.05) | Total number for the topology type | Number that have significant conservation (P < 0.05) | |
Type 1 | 1246 (18%) | 476 (47%) | 665 (13%) | 245 (56%) | 4 (29%) | 0 | 37 (54%) | 18 (95%) |
Type 2 | 605 (9%) | 121 (12%) | 433 (8%) | 71 (16%) | 4 (29%) | 1 | 9 (13%) | 1 (5%) |
Type 3 | 3467 (51%) | -- | 3561 (68%) | -- | 6 (43%) | -- | 23 (33%) | -- |
Type 4 | 324 (5%) | 142 (14%) | 138 (3%) | 39 (9%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Type 5 | 1216 (18%) | 283 (28%) | 442 (8%) | 82 (19%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 6858 | 1022 | 5239 | 437 | 14 | 1 | 69 | 19 |