Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing the caecilian or frog CNEs in the four phylogenetic groups

From: Hox cluster characterization of Banna caecilian (Ichthyophis bannanicus) provides hints for slow evolution of its genome

 

HoxA

HoxB

HoxC

HoxD

Total

 

Caecilian vs. Frog

Caecilian vs. Frog

Caecilian vs. Frog

Caecilian vs. Frog

Caecilian vs. Frog

Gnathostome

39 vs. 36

28 vs. 21

16 vs. 20

33 vs. 25

116 vs. 102

Osteichthyan

4 vs. 4

12 vs. 14

10 vs. 10

2 vs. 4

28 vs. 32

Sarcopterygian

23 vs. 9

20 vs. 0

25 vs. 14

6 vs. 5

74 vs. 28

Tetrapod

43 vs. 42

22 vs. 29

44 vs. 43

29 vs. 32

138 vs. 146

Sub total

109 vs. 91

82 vs. 64

95 vs. 87

70 vs. 66

356 vs. 308