Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing the caecilian or frog CNEs in the four phylogenetic groups

From: Hox cluster characterization of Banna caecilian (Ichthyophis bannanicus) provides hints for slow evolution of its genome

  HoxA HoxB HoxC HoxD Total
  Caecilian vs. Frog Caecilian vs. Frog Caecilian vs. Frog Caecilian vs. Frog Caecilian vs. Frog
Gnathostome 39 vs. 36 28 vs. 21 16 vs. 20 33 vs. 25 116 vs. 102
Osteichthyan 4 vs. 4 12 vs. 14 10 vs. 10 2 vs. 4 28 vs. 32
Sarcopterygian 23 vs. 9 20 vs. 0 25 vs. 14 6 vs. 5 74 vs. 28
Tetrapod 43 vs. 42 22 vs. 29 44 vs. 43 29 vs. 32 138 vs. 146
Sub total 109 vs. 91 82 vs. 64 95 vs. 87 70 vs. 66 356 vs. 308