Skip to main content

Table 1 Significant markers and imprinting status when imprinting was accounted for

From: A GWAS assessment of the contribution of genomic imprinting to the variation of body mass index in mice

Marker

Chr.

Closest QTL a

Status b

p-value c

\(\hat \alpha \;(\times 10^{-3})\)

\(\hat i\;(\times 10^{-3})\)

rs3697020

2

T2dm3 (within)

A

1.476 ×10−6

11.63±2.41

-

rs3676388

2

T2dm2sa (within)

A

9.357 ×10−6

−9.99±2.26

-

rs3726626

15

W3q6 (within)

A

2.987 ×10−6

9.30±1.97

-

rs3662117

2

Gnf1 (within)

M

4.061 ×10−6

2.51±2.61

6.20±2.10

rs6212614

3

Orgwq5 (within)

M

6.197 ×10−6

2.11±1.96

4.18±1.59

rs13476734

2

T2dm3 (within)

P

1.302 ×10−5

−1.36±2.05

4.59±1.79

rs6371982

3

W10q3 (within)

P

5.055 ×10−6

1.05±1.94

−4.36±1.59

rs3665109

3

W10q3 (within)

P

8.690 ×10−6

−1.82±1.92

4.00±1.62

gnf04.110.360

4

W10q10 (within)

P

9.365 ×10−6

1.79±1.96

−4.17±1.62

  1. aInformation from the Mouse Genome Informatics website (http://www.informatics.jax.org/) bA: additively significant; M: maternal imprinting; P: paternal imprinting c p-value threshold was set to 1.316×10−5 to ensure a 0.05 whole-genome type I error rate with Šidák’s correction