Table 1 Fitting the statistical helix model to the relative contact frequencies observed in wild-type (upper part, rows 2–4) and triple KO (lower part, rows 5–7) mouse ES cells (mESCs)
WT vs H1 TKO mESC | K *10 3 | S (kb) | <D > (nm) | <P > (nm) | Sh (kb) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | mouse liver gene-rich | 890 ± 70 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 287 ± 5 | 160 ± 9 | 97 ± 1 |
2 | WT mESC gene-rich (Fig. 2a) | 1,070 ± 80 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 255 ± 8 | 201 ± 13 | 85 ± 2 |
3 | WT mESC gene-poor (Fig. 2b) | 1,880 ± 360 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 262 ± 18 | 213 ± 31 | 87 ± 5 |
4 | WT mESC gene-desert (Fig. 2c) | 1,380 ± 370 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 208 ± 44 | 264 ± 77 | 72 ± 13 |
5 | H1TKO gene-rich (Fig. 3a) | 1,810 ± 140 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 268 ± 8 | 230 ± 14 | 83 ± 2 |
6 | H1TKO gene-poor (Fig. 3b) | 2,270 ± 430 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 269 ± 19 | 224 ± 30 | 83 ± 5 |
7 | H1TKO gene-desert (Fig. 3c) | 2,620 ± 840 | 3.9 ± 0.4 | 264 ± 105 | 380 ± 162 | 86 ± 28 |