Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Genomics

Fig. 3

From: A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling

Fig. 3

a Error rates across four different platforms. Platform had a significant impact on error rate (Kruskal-Wallis comparing MS, 454, IT and PB ROI non-parametric ANOVA p=0.015) as did number of CCS cycles for PB (p=0.016). b Percentage of reads not matching across the four different platforms. Platform had a significant impact on percentage matching (Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA p=0.0001) as did number of CCS cycles for PB (p=0.016)

Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us