Table 2 Comparison of the characterization of the SUTs between sugarcane and sorghum
Sorghum | Sugarcane | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene name | Amino acids size | Molecular weights (kDa) | Domains | Isoelectric point (pI) | Transmembrane helices | Gene name | Amino acids size | Molecular weights (kDa) | Domains | Isoelectric point (pI) | Transmembrane helices | Identity |
SbSUT1 | 519 | 54.99 | MFS domain | 8.86 | 12 | SsSUT1 | 521 | 55.08 | MFS domain | 8.79 | 12 | 96Â % |
SbSUT2 | 594 | 63.33 | MFS domain | 6.00 | 12 | SsSUT2 | 598 | 63.41 | MFS domain | 5.94 | 12 | 96Â % |
SbSUT3 | 507 | 53.20 | MFS domain | 6.58 | 12 | SsSUT3 | 508 | 53.47 | MFS domain | 7.46 | 12 | 96Â % |
SbSUT4 | 501 | 53.44 | MFS domain | 8.60 | 12 | SsSUT4 | 501 | 53.44 | MFS domain | 8.60 | 12 | 98Â % |
SbSUT5 | 534 | 56.38 | MFS domain | 8.72 | 12 | SsSUT5 | 495 | 51.84 | MFS domain | 7.97 | 12 | 83Â % |
SbSUT6 | 536 | 56.36 | MFS domain | 8.45 | 12 | SsSUT6 | 554 | 58.86 | MFS domain | 8.46 | 12 | 88Â % |