Skip to main content

Table 3 The comparison of two classification models of SPAID using alternate control groupsa

From: Absolute quantification reveals the stable transmission of a high copy number variant linked to autoinflammatory disease

Genotypes from marker(s)

Control group

Tree

TP

FP

Precision

Recall

F-measure

AUC

CNV_14.3 and CNV_16.1

C2

J48

0.715

0.389

0.706

0.715

0.708

0.605

 

RF

0.715

0.389

0.706

0.715

0.708

0.613

C1

J48

0.810

0.822

0.671

0.810

0.734

0.575

 

RF

0.810

0.822

0.671

0.810

0.734

0.575

CNV_14.3

C2

J48

0.715

0.389

0.706

0.715

0.708

0.605

 

RF

0.715

0.389

0.706

0.715

0.708

0.611

C1

J48

0.820

0.820

0.673

0.820

0.739

0.457

 

RF

0.820

0.820

0.673

0.820

0.739

0.575

CNV_16.1

C2

J48

0.681

0.473

0.661

0.681

0.661

0.599

 

RF

0.711

0.391

0.702

0.711

0.704

0.612

C1

J48

0.820

0.820

0.673

0.820

0.739

0.457

 

RF

0.810

0.822

0.671

0.810

0.734

0.580

  1. aTwo control groups were considered. Control 2 (C2, n = 80) contained all dogs free from SPAID, irrespective of age, whilst Control 1 (C1, n = 34) included only those individuals older than 60 months with no signs of SPAID. The counts required to calculate the receiver operator curve (ROC) area are reported, including true positive (TP) and false positive (FP)