Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparative assembly results

From: Graph mining for next generation sequencing: leveraging the assembly graph for biological insights

Subject ID Assembler Number of Contigs ≥500 bps N50 (bps) NG50
Abundant
Genera (bps)
(%) reads mapped to contigs Chimeric contigs Contigs with taxonomic assignment Contigs with unknown assignemnt
33 Focus 89994 1310 2050 95.5 % 445 68037 21512
IDBA-UD 33932 1267 1040 89.7 % 56 24534 9342
MetaVelvet 18355 709 N/A 15.0 % 30 13250 5075
Omega 1887 2037 N/A 12.5 % 74 156 1657
104 Focus 150930 1286 2371 95.7 % 720 102618 47592
IDBA-UD 61848 1236 1759 87.3 % 70 42383 19395
MetaVelvet 34011 702 513 17.2 % 41 22556 11414
Omega 2579 2652 N/A 14.8 % 45 532 2002
764143897 Focus 159196 1599 2595 95.2 % 1383 94968 62845
IDBA-UD 60679 1736 4009 92.1 % 265 34174 26240
MetaVelvet 46123 723 626 30.4 % 140 24367 21616
Omega 3433 2531 N/A 15.9 % 78 1637 816
809635352 Focus 251461 1296 2653 91.0 % 2819 127846 120796
IDBA-UD 106962 1199 2976 85.2 % 571 51458 54933
MetaVelvet 76809 719 774 30.7 % 269 33762 42778
Omega 2546 2681 N/A 8.3 % 92 1815 639