Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparative assembly results

From: Graph mining for next generation sequencing: leveraging the assembly graph for biological insights

Subject ID

Assembler

Number of Contigs ≥500 bps

N50 (bps)

NG50

Abundant

Genera (bps)

(%) reads mapped to contigs

Chimeric contigs

Contigs with taxonomic assignment

Contigs with unknown assignemnt

33

Focus

89994

1310

2050

95.5 %

445

68037

21512

IDBA-UD

33932

1267

1040

89.7 %

56

24534

9342

MetaVelvet

18355

709

N/A

15.0 %

30

13250

5075

Omega

1887

2037

N/A

12.5 %

74

156

1657

104

Focus

150930

1286

2371

95.7 %

720

102618

47592

IDBA-UD

61848

1236

1759

87.3 %

70

42383

19395

MetaVelvet

34011

702

513

17.2 %

41

22556

11414

Omega

2579

2652

N/A

14.8 %

45

532

2002

764143897

Focus

159196

1599

2595

95.2 %

1383

94968

62845

IDBA-UD

60679

1736

4009

92.1 %

265

34174

26240

MetaVelvet

46123

723

626

30.4 %

140

24367

21616

Omega

3433

2531

N/A

15.9 %

78

1637

816

809635352

Focus

251461

1296

2653

91.0 %

2819

127846

120796

IDBA-UD

106962

1199

2976

85.2 %

571

51458

54933

MetaVelvet

76809

719

774

30.7 %

269

33762

42778

Omega

2546

2681

N/A

8.3 %

92

1815

639