Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison on non-structure-based NPInter2.0 and RPI13254

From: IPMiner: hidden ncRNA-protein interaction sequential pattern mining with stacked autoencoder for accurate computational prediction

Dataset

Method

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

Precision

MCC

AUC

NPInter2.0

IPMiner

0.952

0.946

0.959

0.945

0.904

0.995

 

SDA-RF

0.937

0.940

0.935

0.941

0.876

0.975

 

SDA-FT-RF

0.934

0.953

0.912

0.955

0.868

0.990

 

RPISeq-RF

0.944

0.940

0.949

0.940

0.889

0.978

 

lncPro

0.928

0.919

0.938

0.917

0.856

0.971

RPI13254

IPMiner

0.945

0.905

0.995

0.895

0.896

0.985

 

SDA-RF

0.699

0.717

0.658

0.741

0.400

0.761

 

SDA-FT-RF

0.813

0.728

0.998

0.626

0.675

0.901

 

RPISeq-RF

0.739

0.766

0.688

0.790

0.480

0.817

 

lncPro

0.712

0.716

0.701

0.723

0.424

0.792

  1. For RPI13254, it has 13524 positive pairs and 5172 negative pairs. Here we randomly sub-sampling positive pairs from original paper to create balanced dataset, so it actually consists of 5172 negative pairs and 5172 positive pairs
  2. The boldface indicates this measure performance is the best among the compared methods for individual dataset