Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons between condition-dependent and temporal regulation of gene expression

From: Genome-wide profiling of 24 hr diel rhythmicity in the water flea, Daphnia pulex: network analysis reveals rhythmic gene expression and enhances functional gene annotation

Experiment Conditions Genotypes Overlap d
Thermal regime a 18 °C vs. 28 °C Low tolerance genotype C 11 % / 183
   Low tolerance genotype E 12 % / 199
   High tolerance genotype B 7 % / 116
   High tolerance genotype K 7 % / 116
Salinity stress b 5 gL−1 NaCl vs. control High tolerance genotype 38 % / 631
   Low tolerance genotype 33 % / 548
Carbon:Phosphorous ratio c HiC:LoP (C:P ~800) vs. LoC:HiP (C:P ~100) (3 days) G1: LoC:HiP tolerance 4 % / 66
   G2: HiC:LoP tolerance 8 % / 133
  HiC:LoP (C:P ~800) vs. LoC:HiP (C:P ~100) (6 h) G1: LoC:HiP tolerance 16 % / 266
   G2: HiC:LoP tolerance 9 % / 149
  1. aYampolsky et al. 2014 [75]
  2. bLatta et al. 2012 [76]
  3. cChowdhury et al. 2014 [77]
  4. dThe number and percent of genes both differentially expressed in the given experimental treatment conditions (q < 0.05) and also rhythmically expressed as determined by JTK_CYCLE in this present study (q < 0.05)