Skip to main content

Table 3 A comparison study

From: Detecting discordance enrichment among a series of two-sample genome-wide expression data sets

KEGG pathway

p-value (GSA-Fisher, up)

p-value (GSA-Fisher, down)

DES

ECM RECEPTOR INTERACTION

0.099

0.843

0.256

CYTOKINE CYTOKINE RECEPTOR INTERACTION

0.774

0.708

0.954

FOCAL ADHESION

0.239

0.432

>0.999

WNT SIGNALING PATHWAY

0.873

0.119

0.995

ADHERENS JUNCTION

0.674

0.454

0.999

JAK STAT SIGNALING PATHWAY

0.696

0.701

0.723

MAPK SIGNALING PATHWAY

0.980

0.130

>0.999

MTOR SIGNALING PATHWAY

0.434

0.475

0.999

PPAR SIGNALING PATHWAY

0.997

<0.001

>0.999

VEGF SIGNALING PATHWAY

0.293

0.868

>0.999

APOPTOSIS

0.399

0.388

>0.999

P53 SIGNALING PATHWAY

<0.001

>0.999

0.104

CELL CYCLE

<0.001

>0.999

<0.001

TGF BETA SIGNALING PATHWAY

0.970

0.090

0.976

  1. For significant detections, check pathways with low p-values or pathways with high DES