Skip to main content

Table 4 QTLs mapped to the weight (e), height (cm), diameter (in), A/D ratio, number of segments, number of seeds, ease of peeling, juice content, total titratable acidity (TTA), total soluble solids (TSS), TSS/TTA ratio, technological index (TI) and number of fruits per box

From: QTL mapping for fruit quality in Citrus using DArTseq markers

Trait G.L cM Marker LOD p LOD q LOD pq LOD Seg. R2
Height 4b 54 100084126|F|0–100027978|F|0 7.96 −0.020 0.02 0.25 6.32 −0.06 0.21 1:1 2.0
Height 5 331 100081813|F|0–100037856|F|0 5.38 −0.075 1.23 0.04 0.44 0.13 3.04 1:2:1 1.58
Diameter 8 32.25 100020211|F|0 5.95 0.14 3.78 −0.12 2.97 0.02 0.13 1:2:1 9.7
A/D 4b 52.23 100084126|F|0 5.87 0.02 0.67 0.01 2.41 −0.00 0.14 1:1 3.8
Segments per fruit 5 315.12 100013979|F|0 10.23 0.3 4.16 −0.39 5.9 −0.25 2.8 3:1 1.7
Number of seeds 3 148.90 100059880|F|0 5.23 1.91 3.68 1.90 2.54 1.59 2.06 3:1 1.8
Number of seeds 8 30.42 100039927|F|0 5.86 0.48 0.33 1.36 2.46 −1.21 1.9 1:2:1 9.3
Ease of peeling 3 126.49 100029799|F|0 16.43 −0.18 2.5 0.41 12.1 0.06 0.47 1:1:1:1 2.6
Juice content 3 121.71 100032263|F|0 6.58 1.17 1.57 −1.86 4.23 −0.46 0.29 1:2:1 0.7
Juice content 6b 0.0 100034495|F|0 7.63 −0.46 0.114 2.29 7.47 NA NA 1:1 1.1
Acidity 6b 130.73 100040907|F|0 8.43 −0.0 0.0 0.07 2.55 −0.08 3.03 1:2:1 4.0
Soluble solids 5 311.68 100065152|F|0 5.2 0.17 0.94 0.19 1.37 −0.3 3.32 3:1 2.0
TSS/TTA 6b 100 100020025|F|0–100077391|F|0 7.74 0.18 0.35 −0.37 1.40 0.76 3.5 1:2:1 7.2
Technological index 4 116.15 100044015|F|0 5.7 0.1 5.7 NA NA NA NA 1:1 0.04
Technological index 5 340.0 100034974|F|0–100104371|F|0 12.47 0.05 1.36 0.08 4.5 −0.11 7.37 1:1:1:1 1.7
Technological index 6b 34.0 100084924|F|0–100033965|F|0 8.26 0.05 1.73 0.1 5.47 0.11 4.69 1:1:1:1 3.4
Technological index 7 83.51 100036043|F|0 5.87 0.07 2.74 0.06 2.25 0.09 3.13 3:1 1.8
Technological index 8 73.53 100043537|F|0 5.97 −0.09 5.32 0.05 1.52 0.05 1.56 1:2:1 8.7
Fruit per box 8 32.25 100020211|F|0 10.90 −19.63 5.04 14.51 2.88 −11.2 1.62 3:1 9.7
  1. LG linkage group, cM position of the QTL in centiMorgans, LOD LOD score, p effect of Murcott tangor parental, q effect of Pera sweet orange parental, pq effect of both parents, Seg QTL segregation, R 2 percentage of the explained phenotypic variance