Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison in artificial data set

From: GaussianCpG: a Gaussian model for detection of CpG island in human genome sequences

aMethod:

I

II

III

IV

V

 T

6854696

6854696

6854696

6854696

6854696

 TP

2101562

3603662

5489738

2531549

5036243

 FN

4753134

3251034

1364958

4323147

1818453

 F

5919255

5919255

5919255

5919255

5919255

 FP

20437

220957

1085303

9319

46906

 TN

5898818

5698298

4833952

5909936

5872349

bMethod:

I

II

III

IV

V

 Sn

30.66%

52.57%

80.09%

36.93%

73.47%

 Sp

99.65%

96.27%

81.66%

99.84%

99.21%

 Acc

62.63%

72.82%

80.82%

66.08%

85.40%

 Mcc

99.04%

94.22%

83.49%

99.63%

99.08%

 Ppv

30.57%

50.93%

69.14%

36.88%

72.97%

 Pc

40.61%

53.18%

61.61%

45.94%

74.04%

 F1

46.82%

67.49%

81.75%

53.89%

84.37%

  1. I:CpGPlot, II:CpGReport, III:CpGProd, IV:CpGCluster, V:GaussianCpG
  2. For Panel a: The unit of measurement is necleotide
  3. True, T: the length of known CpG islands
  4. False, F: the length of non-CpG islands
  5. True positive, TP: the length of predicted known CGIs
  6. False positive, FP: the length of predicted CGIs not in known CGIs
  7. False negative, FN: the length of not predicted known CGIs
  8. True negative, TN: the length of predicted non-CGIs
  9. For Panel b:
  10. Sensitivity, Sn=TP/(TP+FN)
  11. Specificity, Sp=TN/(TN+FP)
  12. Accuracy, Acc=(TP+TN)/(TP+FP+FN+TN)
  13. Mean correlation coefficient,
  14. \({\qquad }{Mcc}={\textstyle {{{TP}\times {TN} - {FN}\times {FP}} \over {\sqrt {({TP} + {FN}) \times ({TN} + {FP}) \times ({TP} + {FP}) \times ({TN} + {FN})} }}}\)
  15. Positive predictive value, Ppv=TP/(TP+FP)
  16. Performance coefficient, Pc=TP/(TP+FN+FP)
  17. F1 score, the harmonic mean of precision and sensitivity,
  18. F1=2×TP/(2×TP+FP+FN)
  19. For Panel a&b: Default parameters for all software are set