Table 11 Comparison of all the results for each species, together with their corresponding performances

Radial using GRCh37 and first ORF

  Sensitivity

9 8 . 9 5 %

9 9 . 4 3 %

9 8 . 7 2 %

94.16%

78.89%

95.19%

93.17%

  Specificity

97.41%

97.23%

97.04%

94.90%

89.28%

95.23%

99.78%

  Accuracy

98.18%

98.33%

97.88%

94.53%

84.08%

95.21%

96.47%

Radial using GRCh38 and first ORF

  Sensitivity

89.86%

97.54%

90.07%

78.13%

55.28%

74.68%

80.87%

  Specificity

9 8 . 6 4 %

9 9 . 2 6 %

98.51%

9 7 . 8 9 %

95.93%

98.45%

99.91%

  Accuracy

94.25%

98.40%

94.29%

88.01%

75.60%

86.56%

88.67%

Radial using GRCm38 and first ORF

  Sensitivity

98.50%

98.90%

98.70%

93.85%

7 9 . 4 0 %

95.14%

94.31%

  Specificity

97.09%

96.93%

96.96%

94.91%

8 9 . 4 3 %

94.70%

99.96%

  Accuracy

97.79%

97.91%

97.83%

94.38%

8 4 . 4 1 %

94.92%

96.97%

Radial using GRCh37, GRCm38 and first ORF

  Sensitivity

98.86%

99.42%

98.51%

93.11%

76.38%

94.62%

91.30%

  Specificity

97.56%

97.69%

9 7 . 5 4 %

95.39%

89.94%

95.63%

99.76%

  Accuracy

9 8 . 2 1 %

9 8 . 5 5 %

98.02%

94.25%

83.16%

95.12%

95.53%

Radial using GRCh38, GRCm38 and first ORF

  Sensitivity

91.22%

99.24%

98.66%

81.00%

55.28%

77.17%

74.95%

  Specificity

98.65%

97.46%

97.41%

97.81%

95.85%

9 8 . 7 4 %

9 9 . 9 2 %

  Accuracy

94.93%

98.35%

9 8 . 0 3 %

89.40%

75.56%

87.95%

87.43%

Radial using GRCm38, GRCz10 and first ORF

  Sensitivity

98.71%

99.10%

98.56%

9 4 . 6 4 %

75.89%

9 7 . 1 9 %

9 8 . 5 7 %

  Specificity

96.89%

96.72%

96.86%

94.69%

89.87%

95.00%

99.65%

  Accuracy

97.80%

97.91%

97.71%

9 4 . 6 7 %

82.88%

9 6 . 0 9 %

9 9 . 1 1 %