Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison between the two versions of REPdenovo and RepARK on Human, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Drosophila melanogaster data

From: An improved approach for reconstructing consensus repeats from short sequence reads

Species

Methods

N

N h

N 0

C avg

C m

 

REPdenovo*

6192

108

332

0.61

0.49

 

REPdenovo

4648

89

220

0.66

0.55

Human

RepARK

2046

1

168

0.34

0.21

 

REPdenovo*

808

24

102

0.42

0.31

 

REPdenovo

508

11

68

0.46

0.34

Arabidopsis

RepARK

632

8

59

0.33

0.21

 

REPdenovo*

3644

69

177

0.83

0.61

 

REPdenovo

3031

33

133

0.67

0.49

Drosophila

RepARK

2,787

26

133

0.66

0.44

  1. REPdenovo*: the new method. N: the total number of repeats constructed. Nh and N0 are the number of hit Repbase repeats with at least 85% and 0% similarity respectively. Cavg: the average Repbase coverage which indicates the average percent of a repeat in Repbase is covered by the constructed repeats. Cm: the average Repbase coverage by the longest assembled repeat