Skip to main content

Table 1 Differential expression feature extraction (DEFE) analyses

From: Transcriptome dynamics associated with resistance and susceptibility against fusarium head blight in four wheat genotypes

Seta Modelled for Treatment DEFE series Wheat DEGs Pathogen DEGs
1 Effect of FHB Fg vs. water FW(S_2, S_4, H_2, H_4, N_2, N_4, W_2, W_4) 22,335 8809
2 FHB resistant vs. susceptible Fg FRS(H/S_2, H/S_4, N/S_2, N/S_4, W/S_2, W/S_4) 20,937 8803
water WRS(H/S_2, H/S_4, N/S_2, N/S_4, W/S_2, W/S_4) 7531 NA
3 Between resistant plants Fg FR(W/N_2, W/N_4, H/N_2, H/N_4, H/W_2, H/W_4) 10,637 4387
water WR(W/N_2, W/N_4, H/N_2, H/N_4, H/W_2, H/W_4) 5534 NA
4 Between two time points Fg FT(S_2/4, H_2/4, N_2/4, W_2/4) 6292 8331
water WT(S_2/4, H_2/4, N_2/4, W_2/4) 4287 NA
  1. aExplanation of each set of comparisons
  2. 1. Comparison between each Fg-treated sample and the corresponding control sample. Where, the prefix “FW” stands for pairwise comparison between Fg and water treated (control) samples; for each comparison, S stands for Shaw, H for HC374, N for Nyubai and W for Wuhan 1
  3. 2. Comparisons of FHB resistant HC374, Nyubai, and Wuhan 1 with the susceptible Shaw in Fg-treated and control samples, respectively; where the second letter “R” in the prefix stands for FHB resistance genotypes
  4. 3. Pairwise comparison among the three FHB resistant genotypes in Fg-treated and control samples, respectively
  5. 4. Comparison between two time points of the same genotype in Fg-treated and control samples, respectively. Where, the second letter “T” stands for time