Skip to main content

Table 1 Differential expression feature extraction (DEFE) analyses

From: Transcriptome dynamics associated with resistance and susceptibility against fusarium head blight in four wheat genotypes

Seta

Modelled for

Treatment

DEFE series

Wheat DEGs

Pathogen DEGs

1

Effect of FHB

Fg vs. water

FW(S_2, S_4, H_2, H_4, N_2, N_4, W_2, W_4)

22,335

8809

2

FHB resistant vs. susceptible

Fg

FRS(H/S_2, H/S_4, N/S_2, N/S_4, W/S_2, W/S_4)

20,937

8803

water

WRS(H/S_2, H/S_4, N/S_2, N/S_4, W/S_2, W/S_4)

7531

NA

3

Between resistant plants

Fg

FR(W/N_2, W/N_4, H/N_2, H/N_4, H/W_2, H/W_4)

10,637

4387

water

WR(W/N_2, W/N_4, H/N_2, H/N_4, H/W_2, H/W_4)

5534

NA

4

Between two time points

Fg

FT(S_2/4, H_2/4, N_2/4, W_2/4)

6292

8331

water

WT(S_2/4, H_2/4, N_2/4, W_2/4)

4287

NA

  1. aExplanation of each set of comparisons
  2. 1. Comparison between each Fg-treated sample and the corresponding control sample. Where, the prefix “FW” stands for pairwise comparison between Fg and water treated (control) samples; for each comparison, S stands for Shaw, H for HC374, N for Nyubai and W for Wuhan 1
  3. 2. Comparisons of FHB resistant HC374, Nyubai, and Wuhan 1 with the susceptible Shaw in Fg-treated and control samples, respectively; where the second letter “R” in the prefix stands for FHB resistance genotypes
  4. 3. Pairwise comparison among the three FHB resistant genotypes in Fg-treated and control samples, respectively
  5. 4. Comparison between two time points of the same genotype in Fg-treated and control samples, respectively. Where, the second letter “T” stands for time