Transcriptomic analysis of crustacean neuropeptide signaling during the moult cycle in the green shore crab, Carcinus maenas

Table 3 Putative neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptor differential expression statistics

Putative neuropeptide GPCR	Cluster	LogFC				F	P	FDR
Putative neuropeptide GPCR	Cluster	A-B	D1	D3	D4	F	P	FDR
Short neuropeptide F R	Cluster-4928.1	−0.48	5.09	−0.90	−0.56	50.25	2.45E-11	1.24E-06
Bursicon R2	Cluster-136,339.5130	2.78	0.90	3.04	3.70	9.81	7.49E-05	0.002
CCHa R1	Cluster-136,339.27034	4.93	11.30	7.01	3.68	10.80	7.82E-05	0.002
Relaxin R3	Cluster-136,999.0	4.38	5.89	2.70	0.85	9.70	8.10E-05	0.002
ITPR-like	Cluster-133,078.1	1.18	−0.40	1.20	1.55	5.84	0.002	0.016
MOODY-like	Cluster-136,339.8771	1.22	1.84	2.37	2.00	5.07	0.004	0.025
Ast-B/MIP-R1	Cluster-136,339.8223	1.34	0.34	1.10	1.79	4.59	0.011	0.049

Differential gene expression analysis statistics (F, P, FDR) for seven C. maenas putative neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptors which were differentially expressed across the moult cycle within the Y organ. LogFC are relative to C3–4. The P-value should be read in conjunction with the false discovery rate (FDR)

ISSN: 1471-2164