Skip to main content

Table 10 Newbler assembly statistics of the bins reported by each tools on the hot spring metagenome. It also shows the time it took each tool to create the bins

From: CLAME: a new alignment-based binning algorithm allows the genomic description of a novel Xanthomonadaceae from the Colombian Andes

Tool Total Bins Total reads Large contigs Expected genome size (Mbp) AVG contig length (bp) Largest contig (bp) N50 GC (%) Time (m)
CLAME 2 380,846 178 3.03 17,067 99,748 31,130 71 9
446 24 25,157 1048 2791 1054 66.17
BiMeta 5 113,070 2131 2.3 1082 28,701 1077 65 211
22,877 728 0.6 867 6907 860 38
273,565 995 2.98 3002 49,922 11,620 72
283,509 3499 5.95 1701 45,994 2185 70
207,349 3857 9.73 2523 41,372 4961 51
MetaProb 5 275,160 3423 5 1460 53,631 1561 69 21
60,580 1350 1.3 966 11,767 966 58
204,718 4262 9.45 2217 29,837 4059 51
47,618 766 0.7 901 6858 898 61
312,294 1486 4.7 3149 63,982 6146 72
AbundanceBin 3 459,353 950 3.7 3876 75,296 12,564 69 1063
190,112 6574 8.1 1240 8964 1475 56
250,905 8938 8.6 968 4762 1005 62
MetaBinG 3 521,865 7765 9.8 1253 30,729 1278 66 131
212,100 3115 4.6 1480 9988 1829 71
125,979 4764 6.7 1400 13,502 1647 51