Skip to main content

Table 10 Newbler assembly statistics of the bins reported by each tools on the hot spring metagenome. It also shows the time it took each tool to create the bins

From: CLAME: a new alignment-based binning algorithm allows the genomic description of a novel Xanthomonadaceae from the Colombian Andes

Tool

Total Bins

Total reads

Large contigs

Expected genome size (Mbp)

AVG contig length (bp)

Largest contig (bp)

N50

GC (%)

Time (m)

CLAME

2

380,846

178

3.03

17,067

99,748

31,130

71

9

446

24

25,157

1048

2791

1054

66.17

BiMeta

5

113,070

2131

2.3

1082

28,701

1077

65

211

22,877

728

0.6

867

6907

860

38

273,565

995

2.98

3002

49,922

11,620

72

283,509

3499

5.95

1701

45,994

2185

70

207,349

3857

9.73

2523

41,372

4961

51

MetaProb

5

275,160

3423

5

1460

53,631

1561

69

21

60,580

1350

1.3

966

11,767

966

58

204,718

4262

9.45

2217

29,837

4059

51

47,618

766

0.7

901

6858

898

61

312,294

1486

4.7

3149

63,982

6146

72

AbundanceBin

3

459,353

950

3.7

3876

75,296

12,564

69

1063

190,112

6574

8.1

1240

8964

1475

56

250,905

8938

8.6

968

4762

1005

62

MetaBinG

3

521,865

7765

9.8

1253

30,729

1278

66

131

212,100

3115

4.6

1480

9988

1829

71

125,979

4764

6.7

1400

13,502

1647

51