Skip to main content

Table 3 Differences in editing in protein coding genes between S. vulgaris mt genomes KOV and KRA

From: Homologous recombination changes the context of Cytochrome b transcription in the mitochondrial genome of Silene vulgaris KRA

Gene Position KRA KOV MTV SD2 S9L S. lati folia S. nocti flora Effect
Loss of editing
nad5 1580 T C > T (0.97) T T T C > T T TCA (S) = > TTA (L)
ccmB 28 T C > T (0.91) T T T C > T C > T CAT (H) = > TAT (Y)
ccmFc 1145 T C > T (0.96) T T T C > T T CCA (P) = > CTA (L)
atp6 partial 839 T C > T (0.96) C C C C > T T ACA (T) = > ATA (I)
New editing
ccmC 584 C > T (0.14) C C C C C C ACC (T) = > ATC (I)
cox2 786 C > T (0.16) C C C C C T Silent ACC (T) = > ACT (T)
cox3 225 C > T (0.15) C C C C C C Silent ACC (T) = > ACT (T)
atp1 555 C > T (0.18) C A A C A C Silent ATC (I) = > ATT (I)
Large differences in editing rates
nad7 926 C > T (0.87) C > T (0.09) C C C C > T T TCA (S) = > TTA (L)
mttB 25 C > T (0.17) C > T (0.96) C C C C A Silent CTG (L) = > TTG (L)
mttB 373 C > T (0.26) C > T (0.96) C C C C > T C CTT (L) = > TTT (F)
mttB 527 C > T (0.02) C > T (0.85) C C C C > T C TCG (S) = > TTG (L)
  1. The sequence/editing in the corresponding positions in three additional S. vulgaris mt genomes and in two Silene species are shown. Editing in the MTV, SD2, and S9L haplotypes was not investigated; only sequence information is given. Editing rate, if available, is stated in parentheses. Editing rates higher than 0.8 in one haplotype and lower than 0.3 in the other one were considered highly different