Skip to main content

Table 3 The 14 stable loci for leaf type traits in two populations across different environments

From: QTL fine-mapping of soybean (Glycine max L.) leaf type associated traits in two RILs populations

RILs namea Loci nameb QTL namec Chrd Bin name CIv1.1 (bp)e Position (cM) LODf ADDg R2 (%)h CIv2.0 (bp)i
ZH Z-loci-31 qLL11c-2 11 Bin107 36,478,191–36,619,869 85.70 2.89 −0.33 7.10 32,011,930–32,147,322
qLL11d 11 Bin107 36,478,191–36,619,869 85.70 2.99 −0.30 6.77 32,011,930–32,147,322
Z-loci-36 qLA14a 14 Bin23 4,871,116–4,920,206 29.80 2.71 −1.18 6.06 4,954,181–5,005,224
qLA14c 14 Bin23 4,871,116–4,920,206 29.80 2.64 −1.48 6.42 4,954,181–5,005,224
Z-loci-37 qLW14a 14 Bin25 5,292,323–5,333,084 30.90 4.40 −0.15 10.44 5,403,689–5,448,621
qLW14c-1 14 Bin25 5,292,323–5,333,084 30.90 4.52 −0.19 10.86 5,403,689–5,448,621
GB G-loci-10 qPL3g-1 3 Bin35 4,763,728–5,164,283 34.90 3.65 0.56 5.19 4,566,741–5,065,688
qPL3i-2 3 Bin35 4,763,728–5,164,283 34.90 2.87 0.75 4.28 4,566,741–5,065,688
G-loci-15 qLS3h 3 Bin142 41,133,188–41,201,407 102.80 3.30 0.05 3.61 39,126,123–39,181,924
qLS3i 3 Bin142 41,133,188–41,201,407 102.80 2.56 0.06 2.71 39,126,123–39,181,924
G-loci-18 qLL4e-1 4 Bin16 4,020,745–4,048,162 21.60 5.11 −0.26 7.51 4,070,205–4,094,078
qLL4g-1 4 Bin16 4,020,745–4,048,162 21.60 13.82 −0.47 18.12 4,070,205–4,094,078
qLL4i 4 Bin16 4,020,745–4,048,162 21.60 11.13 −0.44 15.84 4,070,205–4,094,078
G-loci-23 qPL4f 4 Bin27 4,764,737–4,814,980 25.70 2.77 −0.42 4.01 4,822,857–4,873,263
qPL4g 4 Bin27 4,764,737–4,814,980 25.70 4.63 −0.63 6.47 4,822,857–4,873,263
G-loci-56 qLS12g 12 Bin126 36,772,134–36,809,388 122.10 2.63 −0.05 3.00 36,730,431–36,766,381
qLS12h 12 Bin126 36,772,134–36,809,388 122.10 3.48 −0.05 4.06 36,730,431–36,766,381
G-loci-59 qLW13g 13 Bin187 33,303,067–33,385,748 142.20 2.60 0.13 3.32 34,514,243–34,601,384
qLW13h 13 Bin187 33,303,067–33,385,748 142.20 2.84 0.11 3.47 34,514,243–34,601,384
G-loci-63 qLS14e 14 Bin6 495,526–538,526 4.50 11.01 0.04 13.67 506,220–544,002
qLS14f 14 Bin6 495,526–538,526 4.50 2.89 0.02 3.95 506,220–544,002
qLS14h 14 Bin6 495,526–538,526 4.50 2.78 0.05 3.06 506,220–544,002
G-loci-65 qLW14h 14 Bin9 664,663–746,688 6.70 4.73 −0.09 7.08 659,428–753,278
qLW14i-1 14 Bin9 664,663–746,688 6.70 3.85 −0.20 4.91 659,428–753,278
G-loci-77 qLS16e 16 Bin179 35,798,290–35,892,430 122.30 12.01 0.05 15.30 36,302,667–36,395,478
qLS16i 16 Bin179 35,798,290–35,892,430 122.30 2.67 0.06 2.83 36,302,667–36,395,478
G-loci-93 qLA19g 19 Bin136 45,183,988–45,457,039 110.70 3.16 −1.52 4.24 45,304,487–45,567,452
qLA19h-2 19 Bin136 45,183,988–45,457,039 110.70 4.69 −1.37 6.67 45,304,487–45,567,452
qLA19i 19 Bin136 45,183,988–45,457,039 110.70 2.65 −1.79 3.89 45,304,487–45,567,452
qLW19g 19 Bin136 45,183,988–45,457,039 110.70 12.83 −0.30 18.31 45,304,487–45,567,452
qLW19h-2 19 Bin136 45,183,988–45,457,039 110.70 9.64 −0.21 12.76 45,304,487–45,567,452
G-loci-94 qLS19g-2 19 Bin144 46,060,014–46,274,131 115.90 9.44 0.10 13.77 46,167,548–46,388,153
qLS19i-2 19 Bin144 46,060,014–46,274,131 115.90 8.19 0.11 11.03 46,167,548–46,388,153
  1. aRIL name: ZH Zhonghuang 24 × Huaxia 3 RIL population; GB Guizao 1 × Brazil 13 RIL population
  2. bLoci name is composited with the first letter of RIL population name known as ‘Z’ or ‘G’ and ‘loci’ following its former order
  3. cThe name of QTL is a composite of the leaf traits: leaf area (LA); leaf length (LL); leaf width (LW); petiole length (PL); leaf shape (LS); a: the V6 growth stage in the summer of 2017 at Zengcheng; c: the R4 growth stage in the summer of 2017 at Zengcheng;d: the R6 growth stage in the summer of 2017 at Zengcheng; e: the V6 growth stage in the summer of 2017 at Zengcheng; f: the R2 growth stage in the spring of 2017 at Zengcheng; g: the R4 growth stage in the summer of 2016 at Zengcheng; h: the R6 growth stage in the summer of 2017 at Zengcheng; i: the R6 growth stage in the summer of 2017 at the Guangzhou experimental station
  4. dChr refers to chromosome
  5. eThe physical position corresponding to the 95% confidence interval for the detected QTL based on Glyma.Wm82. a1. v1.1 gene model
  6. fLOD indicates the logarithm of odds score
  7. gPositive and negative values indicated additive effect by the alleles of parents, respectively
  8. hR2 indicates the phenotypic variance explained by individual QTL
  9. iThe most proximal Glyma.Wm82.a2.v1 gene model physical intervals of the detected QTLs were transformed by focusing on the positions of the interval nearest 3′ and 5′ ending genes